These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20002257)

  • 1. Radiographic recognition of dental implants as an aid to identifying the deceased.
    Berketa JW; Hirsch RS; Higgins D; James H
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 20002257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic dental implants recognition for geographic evaluation in human identification.
    Nuzzolese E; Lusito S; Solarino B; Di Vella G
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2008 Jun; 26(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 22689351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy in identification of implant treated patients by use of intraoral radiographs.
    Korkchi M; Lekholm U; Dahlbom U; Borrman H
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1995 Jun; 13(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 9227067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of dental implants through the use of Implant Recognition Software (IRS).
    Michelinakis G; Sharrock A; Barclay CW
    Int Dent J; 2006 Aug; 56(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 16972394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations.
    Thali MJ; Markwalder T; Jackowski C; Sonnenschein M; Dirnhofer R
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16423234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided dental identification: an objective method for assessment of radiographic image similarity.
    Flint DJ; Brent Dove S; Brumit PC; White M; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 19040666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forensic odontologists successfully identify tsunami victims in Phuket, Thailand.
    Schuller-Götzburg P; Suchanek J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Sep; 171(2-3):204-7. PubMed ID: 17029859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The application of computerized tomography (CT) to the dental ageing of children and adolescents.
    Graham JP; O'Donnell CJ; Craig PJ; Walker GL; Hill AJ; Cirillo GN; Clark RM; Gledhill SR; Schneider-Kolsky ME
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Feb; 195(1-3):58-62. PubMed ID: 20022437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental implant changes following incineration.
    Berketa J; James H; Marino V
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Apr; 207(1-3):50-4. PubMed ID: 20880643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The gander disaster: dental identification in a military tragedy.
    Brannon RB; Morlang WM; Smith BC
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1331-5. PubMed ID: 14640281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
    Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Root morphology and anatomical patterns in forensic dental identification: a comparison of computer-aided identification with traditional forensic dental identification.
    van der Meer DT; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Dove SB; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Nov; 55(6):1499-503. PubMed ID: 20629904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position.
    Hubar JS; Carr RF
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Mar; 44(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 10097371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The application of CamScan 2 in forensic dentistry.
    Dostalova T; Eliasova H; Seydlova M; Broucek J; Vavrickova L
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2012 Oct; 19(7):373-80. PubMed ID: 22920758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tube angulation effect on radiographic analysis of the implant-abutment interface.
    Begoña Ormaechea M; Millstein P; Hirayama H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 10074756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of two dental identification computer systems: DAVID and WinID3.
    Al-Amad SH; Clement JG; McCullough MJ; Morales A; Hill AJ
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2007 Jun; 25(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 17577975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Principles of dental identification.
    Rothwell BR
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):253-70. PubMed ID: 11370454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New software for computer-assisted dental-data matching in Disaster Victim Identification and long-term missing persons investigations: "DAVID Web".
    Clement JG; Winship V; Ceddia J; Al-Amad S; Morales A; Hill AJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 May; 159 Suppl 1():S24-9. PubMed ID: 16563679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dental print media and their value in forensic odontology.
    Alt KW; Walz M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1999 Jun; 17(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 10709556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.