These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20002257)

  • 21. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dentists' qualifications affect the accuracy of radiographic identification.
    Soomer H; Lincoln MJ; Ranta H; Penttilä A; Leibur E
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1121-6. PubMed ID: 14535679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of a computerized tomography-based software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: a case report.
    Terzioğlu H; Akkaya M; Ozan O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 19344037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study of a novel three-dimensional force measurement-misfit method.
    Tahmaseb A; van de Weijden JJ; Mercelis P; De Clerck R; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 20369082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of dental aging techniques in forensic odontological practice.
    Pretty IA
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1127-32. PubMed ID: 14535680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A study of osseointegrated dental implants following cremation.
    Berketa JW; James H; Langlois NE; Richards LC
    Aust Dent J; 2014 Jun; 59(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 24861388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Establishing personal identification based on specific patterns of missing, filled, and unrestored teeth.
    Adams BJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 May; 48(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 12762515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Contribution of pantomographic dento-maxillary extra-oral radiography to forensic dentistry. Proposal of formula of analysis for the identification examination. Part 2: perfecting a formula for registering radiographic indexes].
    Nossintchouk RM
    Chir Dent Fr; 1975 Jul; 45(266):42-5. PubMed ID: 1073041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of a laboratory-based computer implant guiding system.
    Barnea E; Alt I; Kolerman R; Nissan J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e6-e10. PubMed ID: 20416521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A descriptive study of the radiographic density of implant restorative cements.
    Wadhwani C; Hess T; Faber T; Piñeyro A; Chen CS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 20416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The critical-size supraalveolar peri-implant defect model: reproducibility in histometric data acquisition of alveolar bone formation and osseointegration.
    Lee J; Tran Q; Seeba G; Wikesjö UM; Susin C
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Dec; 36(12):1067-74. PubMed ID: 19929958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A pilot study in the recovery and recognition of non-osseointegrated dental implants following cremation.
    Berketa J; James H; Marino V
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2011 Dec; 29(2):38-44. PubMed ID: 22717912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.
    Lang LA; Sierraalta M; Hoffensperger M; Wang RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):652-8. PubMed ID: 14579952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Implant bone integration importance in forensic identification.
    De Angelis D; Cattaneo C
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Mar; 60(2):505-8. PubMed ID: 25387697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fraudulent use of radiographic images.
    Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM; Haiter Neto F; Oliveira AE; Tuji FM
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2002 Dec; 20(2):25-30. PubMed ID: 12585670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of dental radiographic identification: an experimental study.
    Sholl SA; Moody GH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Jan; 115(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 11074171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intra- and inter-examiner agreement when assessing radiographic implant bone levels: Differences related to brightness, accuracy, participant demographics and implant characteristics.
    Walton TR; Layton DM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):756-771. PubMed ID: 30240063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The reliability of digitized radiographs for dental identification: a Web-based study.
    Pretty IA; Pretty RJ; Rothwell BR; Sweet D
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1325-30. PubMed ID: 14640280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Forensic identification value of roentgen images in determining tooth-colored dental filling materials].
    Chesne AD; Benthaus S; Brinkmann B
    Arch Kriminol; 1999; 203(3-4):86-90. PubMed ID: 10378041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.