248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20002271)
1. Gamma irradiation as a biological decontaminant and its effect on common fingermark detection techniques and DNA profiling.
Hoile R; Banos C; Colella M; Walsh SJ; Roux C
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 20002271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioterrorism: processing contaminated evidence, the effects of formaldehyde gas on the recovery of latent fingermarks.
Hoile R; Walsh SJ; Roux C
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Sep; 52(5):1097-102. PubMed ID: 17767655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioterrorism: the effects of biological decontamination on the recovery of electronic evidence.
Hoile R; Banos C; Colella M; Roux C
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):143-8. PubMed ID: 21324616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimisation and evaluation of 1,2-indanedione for use as a fingermark reagent and its application to real samples.
Wallace-Kunkel C; Lennard C; Stoilovic M; Roux C
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 17046187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The development and evaluation of radiological decontamination procedures for documents, document inks, and latent fingermarks on porous surfaces.
Parkinson A; Colella M; Evans T
J Forensic Sci; 2010 May; 55(3):728-34. PubMed ID: 20345791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The recovery of latent fingermarks from evidence exposed to ionizing radiation*.
Colella M; Parkinson A; Evans T; Lennard C; Roux C
J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):583-90. PubMed ID: 19302380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Latent fingermark development on a range of porous substrates using ninhydrin analogs--a comparison with ninhydrin and 1,8-diazofluoren.
Berdejo S; Rowe M; Bond JW
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):509-14. PubMed ID: 22103855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fingermark detection sequences on paper substrates.
Marriott C; Lee R; Wilkes Z; Comber B; Spindler X; Roux C; Lennard C
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():30-7. PubMed ID: 24529772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The recovery of latent fingermarks and DNA using a silicone-based casting material.
Shalhoub R; Quinones I; Ames C; Multaney B; Curtis S; Seeboruth H; Moore S; Daniel B
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 178(2-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 18502070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nile red: Alternative to physical developer for the detection of latent fingermarks on wet porous surfaces?
Braasch K; de la Hunty M; Deppe J; Spindler X; Cantu AA; Maynard P; Lennard C; Roux C
Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):74-80. PubMed ID: 23611533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visualising the past - An evaluation of processes and sequences for fingermark recovery from old documents.
Bleay S; Fitzgerald L; Sears V; Kent T
Sci Justice; 2019 Mar; 59(2):125-137. PubMed ID: 30798859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Latent fingermark pore area reproducibility.
Gupta A; Buckley K; Sutton R
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Aug; 179(2-3):172-5. PubMed ID: 18617339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of 1,2-indanedione and 5,6-dimethoxy-1,2-indanedione for the detection of latent fingerprints on porous surfaces.
Roux C; Jones N; Lennard C; Stoilovic M
J Forensic Sci; 2000 Jul; 45(4):761-9. PubMed ID: 10914568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Latent fingerprint detection on porous surfaces by DFO--a practice-orientated approach].
Schwarz L; Beisel M
Arch Kriminol; 2010; 225(3-4):81-9. PubMed ID: 20506707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of chlorine and hydrogen chloride on latent fingermark evidence.
McDonald D; Pope H; Miskelly GM
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jul; 179(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 18538958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single metal deposition versus physical developer: A comparison between two advanced fingermark detection techniques.
Moret S; Lee PLT; de la Hunty M; Spindler X; Lennard C; Roux C
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jan; 294():103-112. PubMed ID: 30500490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of some of the factors influencing fingermark detection.
Chadwick S; Moret S; Jayashanka N; Lennard C; Spindler X; Roux C
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():381-389. PubMed ID: 29960948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thermal development of latent fingermarks on porous surfaces--further observations and refinements.
Song DF; Sommerville D; Brown AG; Shimmon RG; Reedy BJ; Tahtouh M
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jan; 204(1-3):97-110. PubMed ID: 20554406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ninhydrin thiohemiketals: basic research towards improved fingermark detection techniques employing nano-technology.
Almog J; Glasner H
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 20002273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anonymous letters? DNA and fingerprints technologies combined to solve a case.
Barbaro A; Cormaci P; Teatino A; La Marca A; Barbaro A
Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Dec; 146 Suppl():S133-4. PubMed ID: 15639559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
