These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20003146)

  • 1. Effects of discrepancy between imagined and perceived sounds on the N2 component of the event-related potential.
    Wu J; Mai X; Yu Z; Qin S; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 20003146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitch and loudness information encoded in auditory imagery as revealed by event-related potentials.
    Wu J; Yu Z; Mai X; Wei J; Luo Y
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Mar; 48(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 20636291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shared mechanisms in perception and imagery of auditory accents.
    Vlek RJ; Schaefer RS; Gielen CC; Farquhar JD; Desain P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 122(8):1526-32. PubMed ID: 21353631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of physical parameters of sound on the sensory gating effects of N40 in rats.
    Zhou D; Ma Y; Liu N; Chen L; He M; Miao Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Feb; 432(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 18242845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refractoriness, habituation, and mismatch effects in the auditory event-related potential to alternating stimuli.
    Yagcioglu S; Ungan P
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 18281891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related potential (ERP) markers of melodic processing: The N2 component is modulated by structural complexity, not by melodic 'meaningfulness'.
    Minati L; Salvatoni L; Rosazza C; Pietrocini E; Visani E; Panzica F; Scaioli V; Avanzini G; Franceschetti S
    Brain Res Bull; 2010 Aug; 83(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 20600678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seeing sounds and hearing colors: an event-related potential study of auditory-visual synesthesia.
    Goller AI; Otten LJ; Ward J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1869-81. PubMed ID: 18823243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequential processing of interaural timing differences for sound source segregation and spatial localization: evidence from event-related cortical potentials.
    Johnson BW; Hautus MJ; Duff DJ; Clapp WC
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jul; 44(4):541-51. PubMed ID: 17521376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-related potentials during mental imagery of animal sounds.
    Wu J; Mai X; Chan CC; Zheng Y; Luo Y
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Nov; 43(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 17076815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP).
    Pakarinen S; Takegata R; Rinne T; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 118(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 17070103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related potential study to aversive auditory stimuli.
    Czigler I; Cox TJ; Gyimesi K; Horváth J
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jun; 420(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17556101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How the human auditory system treats repetition amongst change.
    Horváth J; Winkler I
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Sep; 368(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 15351440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Familiarity affects the processing of task-irrelevant auditory deviance.
    Jacobsen T; Schröger E; Winkler I; Horváth J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 17(11):1704-13. PubMed ID: 16269107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial location is accurately tracked by human auditory sensory memory: evidence from the mismatch negativity.
    Deouell LY; Parnes A; Pickard N; Knight RT
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 24(5):1488-94. PubMed ID: 16987229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human EEG very high frequency oscillations reflect the number of matches with a template in auditory short-term memory.
    Lenz D; Jeschke M; Schadow J; Naue N; Ohl FW; Herrmann CS
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():81-92. PubMed ID: 18036577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.