These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

677 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20003956)

  • 1. Fracture resistance and deflection of pulpless anterior teeth restored with composite or porcelain veneers.
    D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; Vadini M; D'Amario M; Caputi S
    J Endod; 2010 Jan; 36(1):153-6. PubMed ID: 20003956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro fracture resistance and deflection of pulpless teeth restored with fiber posts and prepared for veneers.
    D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; Vadini M; Zazzeroni S; Ciampoli C; D'Amario M
    J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7):838-41. PubMed ID: 18570991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors veneered with direct composite.
    Baratieri LN; De Andrada MA; Arcari GM; Ritter AV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 10946335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of fiber post presence and restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary incisors: an in vitro study.
    Valdivia AD; Raposo LH; Simamoto-Júnior PC; Novais VR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):147-57. PubMed ID: 22944310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors.
    Batalocco G; Lee H; Ercoli C; Feng C; Malmstrom H
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Feb; 28(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21752192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of ferrule and bonding on the compressive fracture resistance of post and core restorations.
    Dorriz H; Alikhasi M; Mirfazaelian A; Hooshmand T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 19142250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture behavior of human mandibular incisors following endodontic treatment and porcelain veneer restoration.
    Ho HH; Chu FC; Stokes AN
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 11484575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of fiber dowel heights in resin composite cores on restoration failures of endodontically treated teeth.
    Mekayarajjananonth T; Chitcharus N; Winkler S; Bogert MC
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 19400060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth.
    Ng CC; Dumbrigue HB; Al-Bayat MI; Griggs JA; Wakefield CW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Apr; 95(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 16616126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically treated mandibular molars with and without glass fiber post in combination with a zirconia-ceramic crown.
    Salameh Z; Ounsi HF; Aboushelib MN; Sadig W; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 18479800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of posts on the fracture resistance of load-cycled endodontically-treated premolars restored with direct composite resin.
    Hajizadeh H; Namazikhah MS; Moghaddas MJ; Ghavamnasiri M; Majidinia S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):10-7. PubMed ID: 19430621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.
    Newman MP; Yaman P; Dennison J; Rafter M; Billy E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 12690348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of techniques used for re-attachment of endodontically treated crown fractured teeth.
    Loguercio AD; Leski G; Sossmeier D; Kraul A; Oda M; Patzlaff RT; Reis A
    J Dent; 2008 Apr; 36(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 18308450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of different full-coverage crown systems on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with and without glass fiber posts.
    Salameh Z; Sorrentino R; Ounsi HF; Sadig W; Atiyeh F; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7):842-6. PubMed ID: 18570992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct restoration of severely damaged incisors using short fiber-reinforced composite resin.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila LV
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):731-6. PubMed ID: 17614187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors.
    Zhi-Yue L; Yu-Xing Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 12690349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts.
    Naumann M; Preuss A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 16464492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of alveolar bone loss on the load capability of restored endodontically treated teeth: a comparative in vitro study.
    Naumann M; Rosentritt M; Preuss A; Dietrich T
    J Dent; 2006 Nov; 34(10):790-5. PubMed ID: 16600462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.