These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20004076)

  • 1. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform.
    Eltoukhy MM; Faye I; Samir BB
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20004076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments.
    Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Zagrouba E
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 64():79-90. PubMed ID: 26151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of wavelet and curvelet for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram.
    Meselhy Eltoukhy M; Faye I; Belhaouari Samir B
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Apr; 40(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 20163793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybrid cosine and Radon transform-based processing for digital mammogram feature extraction and classification with SVM.
    Lahmiri S; Boukadoum M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5104-7. PubMed ID: 22255487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammogram-based discriminant fusion analysis for breast cancer diagnosis.
    Li JB; Wang YH; Tang LL
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):710-6. PubMed ID: 23153999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A statistical based feature extraction method for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiresolution representation.
    Meselhy Eltoukhy M; Faye I; Belhaouari Samir B
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 22115076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A registration framework for the comparison of mammogram sequences.
    Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jun; 24(6):782-90. PubMed ID: 15957600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technique for preprocessing of digital mammogram.
    Maitra IK; Nag S; Bandyopadhyay SK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 21669471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
    Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
    Singh S; Bovis K
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
    Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An anatomically oriented breast coordinate system for mammogram analysis.
    Brandt SS; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Nielsen M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1841-51. PubMed ID: 21609879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
    Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
    Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mass auto-detection in mammogram based on wavelet transform modulus maximum.
    Ke L; He W; Kang Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():5760-3. PubMed ID: 19963653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of methods for mammogram registration.
    van Engeland S; Snoeren P; Hendriks J; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Nov; 22(11):1436-44. PubMed ID: 14606677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.
    El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
    Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
    Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.