397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20004087)
1. A GMM-IG framework for selecting genes as expression panel biomarkers.
Wang M; Chen JY
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 20004087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
Zeng T; Liu J
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clustering of high-dimensional gene expression data with feature filtering methods and diffusion maps.
Xu R; Damelin S; Nadler B; Wunsch DC
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):91-8. PubMed ID: 19962867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ensemble gene selection by grouping for microarray data classification.
Liu H; Liu L; Zhang H
J Biomed Inform; 2010 Feb; 43(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 19699316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust prostate cancer marker genes emerge from direct integration of inter-study microarray data.
Xu L; Tan AC; Naiman DQ; Geman D; Winslow RL
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3905-11. PubMed ID: 16131522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mixture model with random-effects components for clustering correlated gene-expression profiles.
Ng SK; McLachlan GJ; Wang K; Ben-Tovim Jones L; Ng SW
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1745-52. PubMed ID: 16675467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tumor classification ranking from microarray data.
Hewett R; Kijsanayothin P
BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21. PubMed ID: 18831787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A statistical method for estimating the proportion of differentially expressed genes.
Lai Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2006 Jun; 30(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 16650806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selecting a minimal number of relevant genes from microarray data to design accurate tissue classifiers.
Huang HL; Lee CC; Ho SY
Biosystems; 2007; 90(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 17291683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Weighted lasso in graphical Gaussian modeling for large gene network estimation based on microarray data.
Shimamura T; Imoto S; Yamaguchi R; Miyano S
Genome Inform; 2007; 19():142-53. PubMed ID: 18546512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains.
Inza I; Larrañaga P; Blanco R; Cerrolaza AJ
Artif Intell Med; 2004 Jun; 31(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 15219288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Independent component analysis-based penalized discriminant method for tumor classification using gene expression data.
Huang DS; Zheng CH
Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1855-62. PubMed ID: 16709589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliable gene signatures for microarray classification: assessment of stability and performance.
Davis CA; Gerick F; Hintermair V; Friedel CC; Fundel K; Küffner R; Zimmer R
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2356-63. PubMed ID: 16882647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gene selection using support vector machines with non-convex penalty.
Zhang HH; Ahn J; Lin X; Park C
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 16249260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-platform comparison and visualisation of gene expression data using co-inertia analysis.
Culhane AC; Perrière G; Higgins DG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 4():59. PubMed ID: 14633289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A hierarchical Naïve Bayes Model for handling sample heterogeneity in classification problems: an application to tissue microarrays.
Demichelis F; Magni P; Piergiorgi P; Rubin MA; Bellazzi R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():514. PubMed ID: 17125514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining multiple microarrays in the presence of controlling variables.
Park T; Yi SG; Shin YK; Lee S
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1682-9. PubMed ID: 16705015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clustering expressed genes on the basis of their association with a quantitative phenotype.
Jia Z; Xu S
Genet Res; 2005 Dec; 86(3):193-207. PubMed ID: 16454859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification of microarray data with factor mixture models.
Martella F
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 16287938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
