BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20004442)

  • 1. Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission.
    Søreide K; Winter DC
    Surgery; 2010 Apr; 147(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 20004442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choosing a scholarly journal during manuscript submission: the way how it rings true for physiatrists.
    Özçakar L; Franchignoni F; Kara M; Muñoz Lasa S
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Dec; 48(4):643-7. PubMed ID: 22641249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
    Jones AW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective.
    Savulescu J; Viens AM
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 31(10):591-7. PubMed ID: 16199602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?
    Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
    Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ups and downs of journal impact factors.
    Ogden TL; Bartley DL
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Mar; 52(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 18316351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Author perception of peer review.
    Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [An opinion survey among readers of Revista Médica de Chile].
    Bunout B D; Reyes B H
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Sep; 136(9):1163-8. PubMed ID: 19030661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Authors' criteria for selecting journals.
    Frank E
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):163-4. PubMed ID: 8015134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A significant decline in the American domination of research in gastroenterology with increasing globalization from 1980 to 2005: an analysis of American authorship among 8,251 articles.
    Cappell MS; Davis M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1065-74. PubMed ID: 18477339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals.
    Paladugu R; Schein M; Gardezi S; Wise L
    World J Surg; 2002 Sep; 26(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 12209239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: a study of papers submitted to epidemiology.
    Hall SA; Wilcox AJ
    Epidemiology; 2007 Mar; 18(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 17301708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preparing a manuscript for submission.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):759-61; quiz 762. PubMed ID: 19710971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. North American perception of the prestige of biomechanics serials.
    Knudson DV; Chow JW
    Gait Posture; 2008 May; 27(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 17707642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey.
    Tite L; Schroter S
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Jan; 61(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 17183008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
    Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.
    Landy DC; Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Sharp RR
    Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7. PubMed ID: 19318788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.