169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20004530)
1. Comparison of planned dose distributions calculated by Monte Carlo and Ray-Trace algorithms for the treatment of lung tumors with cyberknife: a preliminary study in 33 patients.
Wilcox EE; Daskalov GM; Lincoln H; Shumway RC; Kaplan BM; Colasanto JM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 May; 77(1):277-84. PubMed ID: 20004530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Zheng D; Zhang Q; Liang X; Zhu X; Verma V; Wang S; Zhou S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):48-58. PubMed ID: 27455476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of four-dimensional (4D) Monte Carlo dose calculation in real-time tumor tracking stereotatic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.
Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tam EK; Tong AS
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5479-87. PubMed ID: 22957615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereotactic radiosurgery-radiotherapy: Should Monte Carlo treatment planning be used for all sites?
Wilcox EE; Daskalov GM; Lincoln H
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2011; 1(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 24674003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of smoothing algorithms in Monte Carlo dose calculations of cyberknife treatment plans: a lung phantom study.
Sudahar H; Gopalakrishna Kurup PG; Murali V; Velmurugan J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2012; 8(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 23174716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of calculation model on dose distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary targets.
Haedinger U; Krieger T; Flentje M; Wulf J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):239-49. PubMed ID: 15629617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of different lung densities on the accuracy of various radiotherapy dose calculation methods: implications for tumour coverage.
Aarup LR; Nahum AE; Zacharatou C; Juhler-Nøttrup T; Knöös T; Nyström H; Specht L; Wieslander E; Korreman SS
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jun; 91(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 19297051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose heterogeneity in the target volume and intensity-modulated radiotherapy to escalate the dose in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.
Schwarz M; Alber M; Lebesque JV; Mijnheer BJ; Damen EM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):561-70. PubMed ID: 15890601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The Monte Carlo method and parallel estimation in the drawing up of radiosurgery treatment plans].
Scielzo G; Grillo Ruggieri F; Schwarz M; Rivolta A; Brunelli B; Surridge M; Gill A; Rietbrock C
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 9717550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo evaluation of RapidArc oropharynx treatment planning strategies for sparing of midline structures.
Bush K; Zavgorodni S; Gagne I; Townson R; Ansbacher W; Beckham W
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4465-79. PubMed ID: 20668338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of pencil beam-based homogeneous vs inhomogeneous target dose planning for stereotactic body radiotherapy of peripheral lung tumors through Monte Carlo-based recalculation.
Ohtakara K; Hoshi H
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 25776903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental evaluations of the accuracy of 3D and 4D planning in robotic tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancers.
Chan MK; Kwong DL; Ng SC; Tong AS; Tam EK
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041712. PubMed ID: 23556882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose distributions in SBRT of lung tumors: Comparison between two different treatment planning algorithms and Monte-Carlo simulation including breathing motions.
Lax I; Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Amor Duch M; Näslund I; Baumann P; Gagliardi G
Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(7):978-88. PubMed ID: 16982567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
