255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20004553)
1. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses.
Brok J; Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Gluud C
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):287-98. PubMed ID: 18824466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.
Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis.
Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 18083463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized clinical trial of small-incision and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: primary and clinical outcomes.
Keus F; Werner JE; Gooszen HG; Oostvogel HJ; van Laarhoven CJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Apr; 143(4):371-7; discussion 377-8. PubMed ID: 18427025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews.
Keus F; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jan; 2010(1):CD008318. PubMed ID: 20091665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cholecystectomy: open, mini or laparoscopic? Review of three Cochrane analyses].
Harboe KM; Bardram L
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Oct; 169(43):3645-8. PubMed ID: 17967262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Anaesthesiological considerations in small-incision and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: implications for pulmonary function. A randomized clinical trial.
Keus F; Ahmed Ali U; Noordergraaf GJ; Roukema JA; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Sep; 51(8):1068-78. PubMed ID: 17697302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
Peters JL; Mengersen KL
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic review: open, small-incision or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.
Keus F; Gooszen HG; Van Laarhoven CJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Feb; 29(4):359-78. PubMed ID: 19035965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic vs. small incision cholecystectomy: Implications for pulmonary function and pain. A randomized clinical trial.
Keus F; Ahmed Ali U; Noordergraaf GJ; Roukema JA; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2008 Mar; 52(3):363-73. PubMed ID: 18076751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.
Keus F; de Jong JA; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Oct; 2006(4):CD006229. PubMed ID: 17054284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analysis: when and how.
Imperiale TF
Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):26S-31S. PubMed ID: 10386080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
