321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20005524)
1. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech.
Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A
J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of audio-visual information and mode of speech on listener perceptions of alaryngeal speakers.
Evitts PM; Van Dine A; Holler A
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2009; 11(6):450-60. PubMed ID: 21271922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
Ng ML; Chu R
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective eye-gaze behaviour during face-to-face communication with proficient alaryngeal speakers: a preliminary study.
Evitts P; Gallop R
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(5):535-49. PubMed ID: 21899671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilization of visual information and listener strategies in intelligibility impairment related to bilateral facial paresis.
Keintz C
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 21682545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual speech improves the intelligibility of time-expanded auditory speech.
Tanaka A; Sakamoto S; Tsumura K; Suzuki Y
Neuroreport; 2009 Mar; 20(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19240661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bimodal audio-visual training enhances auditory adaptation process.
Kawase T; Sakamoto S; Hori Y; Maki A; Suzuki Y; Kobayashi T
Neuroreport; 2009 Sep; 20(14):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19629016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reaction times of normal listeners to laryngeal, alaryngeal, and synthetic speech.
Evitts PM; Searl J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1380-90. PubMed ID: 17197503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech.
Ng ML
J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech intelligibility, acceptability, and communication-related quality of life in Chinese alaryngeal speakers.
Law IK; Ma EP; Yiu EM
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 135(7):704-11. PubMed ID: 19620593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.
McColl DA
J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 16377128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linguistic experience and audio-visual perception of non-native fricatives.
Wang Y; Behne DM; Jiang H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1716-26. PubMed ID: 19045662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perception of pre-vocalic and post-vocalic consonants produced by tracheoesophageal speakers.
Doyle PC; Haaf RG
J Otolaryngol; 1989 Dec; 18(7):350-3. PubMed ID: 2593219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers.
Eadie TL; Doyle PC
Laryngoscope; 2004 Apr; 114(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 15064636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disruptive effects of auditory signal delay on speech perception with lipreading.
Pandey PC; Kunov H; Abel SM
J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 3610989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Seeing to hear better: evidence for early audio-visual interactions in speech identification.
Schwartz JL; Berthommier F; Savariaux C
Cognition; 2004 Sep; 93(2):B69-78. PubMed ID: 15147940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech synthesis in background noise: effects of message formulation and visual information on the intelligibility of American English DECTalk.
Drager KD; Anderson JL; Debarros J; Hayes E; Liebman J; Panek E
Augment Altern Commun; 2007 Jun; 23(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17487630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effects of Contextual Priming and Alaryngeal Speech Mode on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Listener Comfort.
Failla S; Al-Zanoon N; Smith N; Doyle PC
J Voice; 2021 Nov; 35(6):934.e17-934.e23. PubMed ID: 32278613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceptability ratings of tracheoesophageal speech.
Pindzola RH; Cain BH
Laryngoscope; 1988 Apr; 98(4):394-7. PubMed ID: 3352438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
