These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20005563)

  • 1. Strength of the bond as a predictor of marginal performance: an in vitro evaluation of contemporary adhesives.
    Bortolotto T; Mileo A; Krejci I
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 20005563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contemporary adhesives: marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of class II composite restorations.
    Takahashi R; Nikaido T; Tagami J; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Am J Dent; 2012 Jun; 25(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22988690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaption after NaOCl pre-treatment.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Oberschachtsiek H; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 11203789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11203784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate performance of self-etching versus system adhesives with multiple light-activated restoratives.
    Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 15451243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
    Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adhesive bond strengths using self- and light-cured composites.
    Walter R; Macedo GV; Oliveira GM; Swift EJ
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 20020078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bond strength of a total-etch adhesive system.
    Bedran-de-Castro AK; Pereira PN; Pimenta LA; Thompson JY
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 15088725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strengths of a total-etch versus an all-in-one adhesive.
    Ozok AR; Wu MK; De Gee AJ; Wesselink PR
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):479-86. PubMed ID: 15081555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 11203838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of ZOE temporary restoration on resin-dentin bond strength using different adhesive strategies.
    Carvalho CN; de Oliveira Bauer JR; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(3):144-52; discussion 153. PubMed ID: 17518904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin.
    De Munck J; Van Meerbeek B; Satoshi I; Vargas M; Yoshida Y; Armstrong S; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):414-20. PubMed ID: 15002958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium:YAG laser.
    Trajtenberg CP; Pereira PN; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Oct; 17(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 15575443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bonding to worn or fractured incisal edges: shear bond strength of new adhesive systems.
    Goracci C; Bertelli E; Ferrari M
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jan; 35(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 14765637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.