These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2000612)

  • 1. [Experiences of pregnant women with ultrasonic examination].
    Valbø A; Blaas HG
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Jan; 111(3):320-1. PubMed ID: 2000612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Experiences of pregnant women with information procedures in routine ultrasound examinations].
    Sommerseth E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Apr; 113(10):1218-20. PubMed ID: 8493650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasound screening in the 2nd trimester. The pregnant woman's background knowledge, expectations, experiences and acceptances.
    Larsen T; Nguyen TH; Munk M; Svendsen L; Teisner L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 15(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 10976478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The attitude of pregnant women to ultrasound screening. A questionnaire study].
    Skov RV
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Jan; 153(4):283-4. PubMed ID: 1996501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of information, expectations and experiences among women and their partners attending a second-trimester routine ultrasound scan.
    Eurenius K; Axelsson O; Gällstedt-Fransson I; Sjöden PO
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Feb; 9(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 9132261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parental expectations, experiences and reactions, sense of coherence and grade of anxiety related to routine ultrasound examination with normal findings during pregnancy.
    Ekelin M; Crang Svalenius E; Larsson AK; Nyberg P; Marsál K; Dykes AK
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Oct; 29(10):952-9. PubMed ID: 19582763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Second-trimester routine ultrasound screening: expectations and experiences in a nationwide Swedish sample.
    Georgsson Ohman S; Waldenström U
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 32(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 18543374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal anomaly screening: what do women want to know?
    Lalor J; Begley C
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jul; 55(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 16768735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Receipt of information and women's attitudes towards ultrasound scanning during pregnancy.
    Whynes DK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11851962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Routine ultrasound fetal examination in pregnancy: the 'Alesund' randomized controlled trial.
    Eik-Nes SH; Salvesen KA; Okland O; Vatten LJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 15(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 11005114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Information routines in HIV screening of pregnant women].
    Daae C; Bjørndal A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jan; 114(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 8191434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Fears of pregnant women if prenatal examination yields or does not yield any findings].
    Kowalcek I; Lammers C; Brunk J; Bieniakiewicz I; Gembruch U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Mar; 124(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12070797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychological impact of the detection of soft markers on routine ultrasound scanning: a pilot study investigating the modifying role of information.
    Watson MS; Hall S; Langford K; Marteau TM
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Jul; 22(7):569-75. PubMed ID: 12124690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women's perception of information and experiences of nuchal translucency screening in Greece.
    Gourounti K; Lykeridou K; Daskalakis G; Glentis S; Sandall J; Antsaklis A
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 18648204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Providing letters and audiotapes to supplement a prenatal diagnostic consultation: effects on later distress and recall.
    Cope CD; Lyons AC; Donovan V; Rylance M; Kilby MD
    Prenat Diagn; 2003 Dec; 23(13):1060-7. PubMed ID: 14691993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unexpected diagnosis of fetal abnormality: women's encounters with caregivers.
    Lalor JG; Devane D; Begley CM
    Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 17324182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving patients' knowledge of the fetal anomaly scan.
    Smith RP; Titmarsh S; Overton TG
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 24(7):740-4. PubMed ID: 15386603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceived prenatal learning needs of multigravid Ghanaian women.
    Bansah M; O'Brien B; Oware-Gyekye F
    Midwifery; 2009 Jun; 25(3):317-26. PubMed ID: 17964014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A Norwegian consensus on ultrasound scanning. Do not screen pregnant women but provide them with information].
    Waldenström U
    Lakartidningen; 1995 May; 92(19):2017-8. PubMed ID: 7752744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-dimensional vs. two- plus four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancy and the effect on maternal emotional status: a randomized study.
    Rustico MA; Mastromatteo C; Grigio M; Maggioni C; Gregori D; Nicolini U
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 15849804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.