These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Sato FR; Asprino L; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; de Moraes M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery. Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading. Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques. Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis. Sato FR; Asprino L; Consani S; Noritomi PY; de Moraes M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Nov; 114(5 Suppl):S60-8. PubMed ID: 23083958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate mechanical stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixed with resorbable compared with titanium bicortical screws in mandibles of sheep. Cilasun U; Uckan S; Dolanmaz D; Saglam H Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):534-7. PubMed ID: 16423434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis. Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques. Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of modified plating techniques for bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement. Sener I; Arıcı S; Bereket C; Tek M J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1573-6. PubMed ID: 22976664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of 1.5 mm vs. 2.0 mm screws for fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy. Scaf de Molon R; de Ávila ÉD; Scartezini GR; Bonini Campos JA; Vaz LG; Real Gabrielli MF; Pereira Filho VA J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 21227709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of number and geometry of resorbable screws on biomechanical stability of in vitro model with sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Hwang JM; Baek SH; Choi JY J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 23(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 22421826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading. Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15749208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles. Oguz Y; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D; Uckan S Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 20226575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability of osteosynthesis with bicortical screws placed in a triangular shape in mandibular sagittal split 5 mm advancement osteotomy: biomechanical tests. Hadi G; Karine BG; Yves C; Pierre L Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 48(8):624-8. PubMed ID: 20007004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]