These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging. Stark DD; McCarthy SM; Filly RA; Parer JT; Hricak H; Callen PW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 May; 144(5):947-50. PubMed ID: 3872578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of classic and digital pelvimetry for measuring the medial transverse diameter in 50 female patients]. Montoy JC; Ravaux S; Blache G J Radiol; 1990 Nov; 71(11):633-8. PubMed ID: 2283626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Obstetric pelvimetry using nuclear magnetic resonance tomography (MRI): clinical experiences with 150 patients]. Bauer M; Schulz-Wendtland R; De Gregorio G; Sigmund G Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 52(6):322-6. PubMed ID: 1634092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia. Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Hatab MR; Twickler DM; Leveno KJ Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):919-26. PubMed ID: 16260507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of pelvimetry is affected by observer experience but not by breed and sex: A cross-sectional study in beef cattle. Vernooij J; de Munck F; van Nieuwenhuizen E; Webb E; Jonker H; Vos P; Holm D Reprod Domest Anim; 2020 Nov; 55(11):1592-1598. PubMed ID: 32885509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Meaning of assimilation pelvis according to Kirchhoff in modern obstetrics]. Krauss T; Osmers R; Westerfeld S; Metzger I; Puchta J; Kuhn W Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1997; 201(6):247-52. PubMed ID: 9491544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ADC measurements of lymph nodes: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility study and an overview of the literature. Kwee TC; Takahara T; Luijten PR; Nievelstein RA Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 19375259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How reproducible are classical and new CT-pelvimetry measurements? Capelle C; Devos P; Caudrelier C; Verpillat P; Fourquet T; Puech P; Garabedian C; Lemaitre L Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Feb; 101(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 31473163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A vaginal delivery protocol for the term breech infant utilizing ball pelvimetry. Capeless EL; Mann LI J Reprod Med; 1985 Jul; 30(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 4032392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-examiner, intra-session and inter-session reliability of gait measurement. Leszczewska J; Czaprowski D; Pawłowska P; Białobrzewska K; Gębicka A; Kotwicki T Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 176():155-8. PubMed ID: 22744480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of X-ray pelvimetry and CT pelvimetry. Raman S; Samuel D; Suresh K Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Aug; 31(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 1804081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]