BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20006694)

  • 21. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Medial olivocochlear functioning and speech perception in noise in older adults.
    Mukari SZ; Mamat WH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(5):328-34. PubMed ID: 18460868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aging effects on detection of spectral changes induced by a break in sound correlation.
    Qu T; Cao S; Chen X; Huang Y; Li L; Wu X; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 23132528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing.
    Arlinger S; Dryselius H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Psychophysical suppression effects for tonal and speech signals.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2108-19. PubMed ID: 11681388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
    Feng Y; Yin S; Kiefte M; Wang J
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of voice cuing on releasing speech from informational masking disappears in older adults.
    Huang Y; Xu L; Wu X; Li L
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 20531200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of priming on release from informational masking is equivalent for younger and older adults.
    Ezzatian P; Li L; Pichora-Fuller K; Schneider B
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 21178568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D; Bologna WJ; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1133. PubMed ID: 28253707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907. PubMed ID: 12083223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relations between perceptual measures of temporal processing, auditory-evoked brainstem responses and speech intelligibility in noise.
    Papakonstantinou A; Strelcyk O; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):30-7. PubMed ID: 21354285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing.
    Buss E; Leibold LJ; Porter HL; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2650. PubMed ID: 28464682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustic stapedius reflex function in man revisited.
    Aiken SJ; Andrus JN; Bance M; Phillips DP
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):e38-51. PubMed ID: 23403808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of speech signal content and speaker gender on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal hearing.
    Plyler PN; Alworth LN; Rossini TP; Mapes KE
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 21309641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age-related difference in melodic pitch perception is probably mediated by temporal processing: empirical and computational evidence.
    Russo FA; Ives DT; Goy H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Patterson RD
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 22367092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.