396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2000752)
1. The effects of high (sodium meglumine diatrizoate, Renografin-76) and low osmolar (sodium meglumine ioxaglate, Hexabrix) radiographic contrast media on diastolic function during left ventriculography in patients.
Aguirre FV; Pedersen W; Castello R; Deligonul U; Gudipati C; Serota H; Labovitz AJ; Kern MJ
Am Heart J; 1991 Mar; 121(3 Pt 1):848-57. PubMed ID: 2000752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine.
Cooper MW; Reed PJ
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 1781822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 following left ventriculography and coronary arteriography.
Svenson RH
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S333-4. PubMed ID: 6392162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term hemodynamic effects of diatrizoate and ioxaglate contrast media in left ventriculography.
Fast JH; Uyen GJ; Heystraten FM; de Boo TM; Lemmens WA
Int J Cardiol; 1985 May; 8(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 3997289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemodynamic changes induced by cardiac angiography with ioxaglate: comparison with diatrizoate.
Hirshfeld JW; Laskey W; Martin JL; Groh WC; Untereker W; Wolf GL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Nov; 2(5):954-7. PubMed ID: 6630771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast media.
Fraser AG; Culling W; Singh H; Ruttley MS; Newcombe RG
Eur Heart J; 1984 Sep; 5(9):727-34. PubMed ID: 6389137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic effects of a new low osmolar nonionic and a standard ionic contrast agent after left ventriculography.
Werner GS; Schmidt T; Scholz KH; Figulla HR; Kreuzer H
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Sep; 33(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 8001095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential hemodynamic effects of Hypaque-76 and Renografin-76 during coronary angiography: the role of calcium-binding additives.
Hwang MH; Murdock DK; Piao ZE; Gries WJ; Scanlon PJ
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 15(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 3136927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography.
Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Dahlgren M; Muslin A
Am J Cardiol; 1989 Feb; 63(7):489-95. PubMed ID: 2916435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: comparison with a conventional contrast agent.
Spataro RF; Katzberg RW; Fischer HW; McMannis MJ
Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 3538156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of ionic and nonionic radiographic contrast media on coronary hyperemia in patients during coronary angiography.
Tatineni S; Kern MJ; Deligonul U; Aguirre F
Am Heart J; 1992 Mar; 123(3):621-7. PubMed ID: 1539514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of low osmolality contrast materials on coronary hemodynamics, myocardial function, and coronary sinus osmolality in normal and ischemic states.
Deutsch AL; Gerber KH; Haigler FH; Higgins CB
Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 7118517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic abnormalities during coronary angiography: comparison of Hypaque-76, Hexabrix, and Omnipaque-350.
Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Hwang MH; Raymond RM; Scanlon PJ
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1989 Mar; 16(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 2920387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safe ex vivo coronary angiography with isosmotic contrast agent.
Schmit DB; Kern JA; Mauney MC; Kron IL; Tribble CG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Aug; 112(2):306-9. PubMed ID: 8751495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography.
Reagan K; Bettman MA; Finkelstein J; Ganz P; Grassi CJ
Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 3282261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A double-blind clinical comparison of the electrophysiologic adverse effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76.
Wolf GL
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S328-32. PubMed ID: 6392161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiographic contrast agents and platelet function: a quenched-flow study.
Taylor MA; Angello DA; Ayers CR; Gear AR
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 2032275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Renal, hemodynamic, and electrocardiographic effects of low versus high osmolality contrast agents on the transplanted heart.
Henzlova MJ; Bittner V; Bourge RC; Nath H; Kirklin JK; Rogers WJ
J Heart Lung Transplant; 1992; 11(3 Pt 1):584-6. PubMed ID: 1610868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeated intracoronary injections of contrast media. Additive hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects in a dog model.
Jacobsen EA; Kløw NE; Pedersen HK; Refsum H
Invest Radiol; 1993 Oct; 28(10):917-24. PubMed ID: 8262746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
