These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20008681)

  • 1. Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction on the Lombard effect.
    Garnier M; Henrich N; Dubois D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):588-608. PubMed ID: 20008681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers.
    Södersten M; Ternström S; Bohman M
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 15766848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalization.
    Chen Z; Liu P; Jones JA; Huang D; Liu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):EL355-60. PubMed ID: 21218857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Equal autophonic level curves under different room acoustics conditions.
    Pelegrín-García D; Fuentes-Mendizábal O; Brunskog J; Jeong CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):228-38. PubMed ID: 21786893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
    Li L; Huang J; Wu X; Qi JG; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of linguistic content on the Lombard effect.
    Patel R; Schell KW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Feb; 51(1):209-20. PubMed ID: 18230867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic and articulatory features of diphthong production: a speech clarity study.
    Tasko SM; Greilick K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):84-99. PubMed ID: 19948757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech production modifications produced in the presence of low-pass and high-pass filtered noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1495-9. PubMed ID: 19739762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bimodal audio-visual training enhances auditory adaptation process.
    Kawase T; Sakamoto S; Hori Y; Maki A; Suzuki Y; Kobayashi T
    Neuroreport; 2009 Sep; 20(14):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19629016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intelligibility and listener preference of telephone speech in the presence of babble noise.
    Hall JL; Flanagan JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 20058974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments.
    Pelegrín-García D; Smits B; Brunskog J; Jeong CH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):1981-90. PubMed ID: 21476654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning.
    Shiller DM; Sato M; Gracco VL; Baum SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1103-13. PubMed ID: 19206885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of blindness on production-perception relationships: Compensation strategies for a lip-tube perturbation of the French [u].
    Ménard L; Turgeon C; Trudeau-Fisette P; Bellavance-Courtemanche M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2016; 30(3-5):227-48. PubMed ID: 26403592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception abilities of adults with dyslexia: is there any evidence for a true deficit?
    Hazan V; Messaoud-Galusi S; Rosen S; Nouwens S; Shakespeare B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1510-29. PubMed ID: 19635940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ARTSTREAM: a neural network model of auditory scene analysis and source segregation.
    Grossberg S; Govindarajan KK; Wyse LL; Cohen MA
    Neural Netw; 2004 May; 17(4):511-36. PubMed ID: 15109681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of speech noise on vocal fundamental frequency using power spectral analysis.
    Lee GS; Hsiao TY; Yang CC; Kuo TB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 17485983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.