These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20008716)
1. Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Bengtsson B; Patella VM; Heijl A Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 127(12):1610-5. PubMed ID: 20008716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new index to monitor central visual field progression in glaucoma. de Moraes CG; Furlanetto RL; Ritch R; Liebmann JM Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 24726202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the accuracy of the visual field index for the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma. Talbot R; Goldberg I; Kelly P Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 156(6):1272-6. PubMed ID: 24075425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of the visual field index in glaucoma patients with moderately advanced visual field loss. Lee JM; Cirineo N; Ramanathan M; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Morales E; Coleman AL; Caprioli J Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 157(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 24200229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of methods to predict visual field progression in glaucoma. Nouri-Mahdavi K; Hoffman D; Ralli M; Caprioli J Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 125(9):1176-81. PubMed ID: 17846355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Properties of the statpac visual field index. Artes PH; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Heckler L; Sharpe GP; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4030-8. PubMed ID: 21467169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression Using Baseline Clinical Data. Ernest PJ; Schouten JS; Beckers HJ; Hendrikse F; Prins MH; Webers CA J Glaucoma; 2016 Feb; 25(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 25265001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual field progression in glaucoma: estimating the overall significance of deterioration with permutation analyses of pointwise linear regression (PoPLR). O'Leary N; Chauhan BC; Artes PH Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):6776-84. PubMed ID: 22952123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perimetric progression in open angle glaucoma and the Visual Field Index (VFI). Ang GS; Mustafa MS; Scott N; Diaz-Aleman VT; Azuara-Blanco A J Glaucoma; 2011; 20(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 20577112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual field index rate and event-based glaucoma progression analysis: comparison in a glaucoma population. Casas-Llera P; Rebolleda G; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Arnalich-Montiel F; Pérez-López M; Fernández-Buenaga R Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 93(12):1576-9. PubMed ID: 19535357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of point-wise exponential regression to measure the decay rates of glaucomatous visual fields. Azarbod P; Mock D; Bitrian E; Afifi AA; Yu F; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Coleman AL; Caprioli J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5403-9. PubMed ID: 22743320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for visual field progression in treated glaucoma. De Moraes CG; Juthani VJ; Liebmann JM; Teng CC; Tello C; Susanna R; Ritch R Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 129(5):562-8. PubMed ID: 21555607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examination of the performance of different pointwise linear regression progression criteria to detect glaucomatous visual field change. De Moraes CG; Liebmann CA; Susanna R; Ritch R; Liebmann JM Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e190-6. PubMed ID: 21902781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement of the visual field index in clinical glaucoma care. Cohen SL; Rosen AI; Tan X; Kingdom FA Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 51(6):445-451. PubMed ID: 27938956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study. Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y; Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting rates of visual field progression in glaucoma patients with optic disc hemorrhage. Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Teng CC; Tello C; Ritch R; Liebmann JM Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19896197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longitudinal structure-function relationships with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and standard achromatic perimetry. Nassiri N; Nilforushan N; Coleman AL; Law SK; Caprioli J; Nouri-Mahdavi K Arch Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; 130(7):826-32. PubMed ID: 22776919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified visual field trend analysis. De Moraes CG; Ritch R; Tello C; Liebmann JM J Glaucoma; 2011; 20(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 20520567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]