BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20008812)

  • 1. Microbiological and chemical analyses of ice collected from a commercial poultry processing establishment.
    Northcutt JK; Smith D
    Poult Sci; 2010 Jan; 89(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 20008812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Changes in the microbial picture during the production of poultry salami].
    Pipová M; Turek P; Laciaková A; Ivanová M; Plachá I
    Vet Med (Praha); 1997 Mar; 42(3):81-5. PubMed ID: 9182395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative investigation of the effects of chemical decontamination procedures on the microbiological status of broiler carcasses during processing.
    Whyte P; Collins JD; McGill K; Monahan C; O'Mahony H
    J Food Prot; 2001 Feb; 64(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 11271764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usefulness of indicator bacteria as potential marker of Campylobacter contamination in broiler carcasses.
    Roccato A; Mancin M; Barco L; Cibin V; Antonello K; Cocola F; Ricci A
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Jul; 276():63-70. PubMed ID: 29674142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacterial counts associated with poultry processing at different sampling times.
    Geornaras I; von Holy A
    J Basic Microbiol; 2000; 40(5-6):343-9. PubMed ID: 11199494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of hot water pasteurizing treatments on the microbiological condition of manufacturing beef used for hamburger patty manufacture.
    Gill CO; Bryant J; Badoni M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2001 Feb; 63(3):243-56. PubMed ID: 11246908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of an herbal extract on the microbiological quality of broiler carcasses during a simulated chill.
    Dickens JA; Berrang ME; Cox NA
    Poult Sci; 2000 Aug; 79(8):1200-3. PubMed ID: 10947192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Presence and level of Campylobacter, coliforms, Escherichia coli, and total aerobic bacteria recovered from broiler parts with and without skin.
    Berrang ME; Ladely SR; Buhr RJ
    J Food Prot; 2001 Feb; 64(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 11271765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbiological survey of a South African poultry processing plant.
    Geornaras I; de Jesus A; van Zyl E; von Holy A
    J Basic Microbiol; 1995; 35(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 7783001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Profile of selected bacterial counts and Salmonella prevalence on raw poultry in a poultry slaughter establishment.
    James WO; Williams WO; Prucha JC; Johnston R; Christensen W
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Jan; 200(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 1537691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distribution and prevalence of airborne microorganisms in three commercial poultry processing plants.
    Whyte P; Collins JD; McGill K; Monahan C; O'Mahony H
    J Food Prot; 2001 Mar; 64(3):388-91. PubMed ID: 11252485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhanced control of microbiological contamination of product at a large beef packing plant.
    Yang X; Badoni M; Youssef MK; Gill CO
    J Food Prot; 2012 Jan; 75(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 22221368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microbiological effects of hand washing at a beef carcass-breaking facility.
    Gill CO; McGinnis JC
    J Food Prot; 2003 Mar; 66(3):493-6. PubMed ID: 12636307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects on the microbiological condition of product of carcass dressing, cooling, and portioning processes at a poultry packing plant.
    Gill CO; Moza LF; Badoni M; Barbut S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 110(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 16793158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contamination of faecal coliforms in ice cubes sampled from food outlets in Kubang Kerian, Kelantan.
    Noor Izani NJ; Zulaikha AR; Mohamad Noor MR; Amri MA; Mahat NA
    Trop Biomed; 2012 Mar; 29(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 22543605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbiological survey of five poultry processing plants in the UK.
    Mead GC; Hudson WR; Hinton MH
    Br Poult Sci; 1993 Jul; 34(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 8358637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of commercial steam pasteurization on the levels of Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia coli on naturally contaminated beef carcasses.
    Minihan D; Whyte P; O'Mahony M; Collins JD
    J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health; 2003 Sep; 50(7):352-6. PubMed ID: 14535935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of visible faecal material as a vehicle for generic Escherichia coli, coliform, and other enterobacteria contaminating poultry carcasses during slaughtering.
    Jiménez SM; Tiburzi MC; Salsi MS; Pirovani ME; Moguilevsky MA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2003; 95(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 12911691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.