177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20009194)
1. A method for partial volume correction of PET-imaged tumor heterogeneity using expectation maximization with a spatially varying point spread function.
Barbee DL; Flynn RT; Holden JE; Nickles RJ; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(1):221-36. PubMed ID: 20009194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of realistic PET simulations incorporating tumor patient's specificity using anthropomorphic models: creation of an oncology database.
Papadimitroulas P; Loudos G; Le Maitre A; Hatt M; Tixier F; Efthimiou N; Nikiforidis GC; Visvikis D; Kagadis GC
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112506. PubMed ID: 24320465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain partial volume correction with point spreading function reconstruction in high-resolution digital PET: comparison with an MR-based method in FDG imaging.
Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Shinohara Y; Shidahara M; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 36(8):717-727. PubMed ID: 35616808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the partial volume correction method on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose brain kinetic modelling from dynamic PET images reconstructed with resolution model based OSEM.
Bowen SL; Byars LG; Michel CJ; Chonde DB; Catana C
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7081-106. PubMed ID: 24052021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Partial volume correction strategies for quantitative FDG PET in oncology.
Hoetjes NJ; van Velden FH; Hoekstra OS; Hoekstra CJ; Krak NC; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Aug; 37(9):1679-87. PubMed ID: 20422184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Point-Spread Function Modeling on PET Image Quality in Integrated PET/MR Hybrid Imaging.
Aklan B; Oehmigen M; Beiderwellen K; Ruhlmann M; Paulus DH; Jakoby BW; Ritt P; Quick HH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26471697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental evaluation and basis function optimization of the spatially variant image-space PSF on the Ingenuity PET/MR scanner.
Kotasidis FA; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):062501. PubMed ID: 24877835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Towards accurate partial volume correction in
Gillen R; Erlandsson K; Denis-Bacelar AM; Thielemans K; Hutton BF; McQuaid SJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Sep; 9(1):59. PubMed ID: 36064882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of quantitative, efficient image reconstruction for VersaPET, a compact PET system.
Wei S; Vaska P
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2852-2868. PubMed ID: 32219853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and Precision of Partial-Volume Correction in Oncological PET/CT Studies.
Cysouw MCF; Kramer GM; Hoekstra OS; Frings V; de Langen AJ; Smit EF; van den Eertwegh AJ; Oprea-Lager DE; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1642-1649. PubMed ID: 27230933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterisation of partial volume effect and region-based correction in small animal positron emission tomography (PET) of the rat brain.
Lehnert W; Gregoire MC; Reilhac A; Meikle SR
Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):2144-57. PubMed ID: 22387126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep learning-based partial volume correction in standard and low-dose positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging.
Azimi MS; Kamali-Asl A; Ay MR; Zeraatkar N; Hosseini MS; Sanaat A; Dadgar H; Arabi H
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Mar; 14(3):2146-2164. PubMed ID: 38545051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PET imaging for the quantification of biologically heterogeneous tumours: measuring the effect of relative position on image-based quantification of dose-painting targets.
McCall KC; Barbee DL; Kissick MW; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(10):2789-806. PubMed ID: 20413832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Partial volume effect correction in PET using regularized iterative deconvolution with variance control based on local topology.
Kirov AS; Piao JZ; Schmidtlein CR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(10):2577-91. PubMed ID: 18441414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Symmetric geometric transfer matrix partial volume correction for PET imaging: principle, validation and robustness.
Sattarivand M; Kusano M; Poon I; Caldwell C
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7101-16. PubMed ID: 23051703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative assessment of statistical brain MR image segmentation algorithms and their impact on partial volume correction in PET.
Zaidi H; Ruest T; Schoenahl F; Montandon ML
Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1591-607. PubMed ID: 16828315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The importance of appropriate partial volume correction for PET quantification in Alzheimer's disease.
Thomas BA; Erlandsson K; Modat M; Thurfjell L; Vandenberghe R; Ourselin S; Hutton BF
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Jun; 38(6):1104-19. PubMed ID: 21336694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The edge artifact in the point-spread function-based PET reconstruction at different sphere-to-background ratios of radioactivity.
Kidera D; Kihara K; Akamatsu G; Mikasa S; Taniguchi T; Tsutsui Y; Takeshita T; Maebatake A; Miwa K; Sasaki M
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 26531181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation.
Rousset OG; Ma Y; Evans AC
J Nucl Med; 1998 May; 39(5):904-11. PubMed ID: 9591599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An algorithm for PET tumor volume and activity quantification: without specifying camera's point spread function (PSF).
Bhatt R; Adjouadi M; Goryawala M; Gulec SA; McGoron AJ
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4187-202. PubMed ID: 22830752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
