164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20009243)
1. Are the defined substrate-based methods adequate to determine the microbiological quality of natural recreational waters?
Valente MS; Pedro P; Alonso MC; Borrego JJ; Dionísio L
J Water Health; 2010 Mar; 8(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20009243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bacteriological water quality along the Tijuana-Ensenada, Baja California, México shoreline.
Orozco-Borbón MV; Rico-Mora R; Weisberg SB; Noble RT; Dorsey JH; Leecaster MK; McGee CD
Mar Pollut Bull; 2006 Oct; 52(10):1190-6. PubMed ID: 16678215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Microbial indicators and fresh water quality assessment].
Briancesco R
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2005; 41(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 16552126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid detection of Escherichia coli and enterococci in recreational water using an immunomagnetic separation/adenosine triphosphate technique.
Bushon RN; Brady AM; Likirdopulos CA; Cireddu JV
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 106(2):432-41. PubMed ID: 19200311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monitoring coastal marine waters for spore-forming bacteria of faecal and soil origin to determine point from non-point source pollution.
Fujioka RS
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(7):181-8. PubMed ID: 11724486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Specificity of a defined substrate method used to monitor balneability of tropical coastal waters impacted by polluted stormwater.
Sousa OV; Evangelista-Barreto NS; Catter KM; Fonteles-Filho AA; Macrae A; Fernandes Vieira RH
J Water Health; 2010 Sep; 8(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 20375483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of recreation on recreational water quality of a small tropical stream.
Phillip DA; Antoine P; Cooper V; Francis L; Mangal E; Seepersad N; Ragoo R; Ramsaran S; Singh I; Ramsubhag A
J Environ Monit; 2009 Jun; 11(6):1192-8. PubMed ID: 19513450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of microcosms to determine persistence of Escherichia coli in recreational coastal water and sediment and validation with in situ measurements.
Craig DL; Fallowfield HJ; Cromar NJ
J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 96(5):922-30. PubMed ID: 15078507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a new medium for the enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in Japanese surface waters.
Kodaka H; Mizuochi S; Saito M; Matsuoka H
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 104(4):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17976170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bathing waters: new directive, new standards, new quality approach.
Mansilha CR; Coelho CA; Heitor AM; Amado J; Martins JP; Gameiro P
Mar Pollut Bull; 2009 Oct; 58(10):1562-5. PubMed ID: 19732913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of mussels as biosamplers for characterization of faecal pollution in coastal recreational waters.
Roslev P; Bukh AS; Iversen L; Sønderbo H; Iversen N
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):586-93. PubMed ID: 20706005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the lactose Tergitol-7, m-Endo LES, Colilert 18, Readycult Coliforms 100, Water-Check-100, 3M Petrifilm EC and DryCult Coliform test methods for detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water samples.
Hörman A; Hänninen ML
Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(17):3249-56. PubMed ID: 16916531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A long-term study comparing membrane filtration with Colilert defined substrates in detecting fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli in natural waters.
Buckalew DW; Hartman LJ; Grimsley GA; Martin AE; Register KM
J Environ Manage; 2006 Aug; 80(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16338057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cross comparison of QPCR to agar-based or defined substrate test methods for the determination of Escherichia coli and enterococci in municipal water quality monitoring programs.
Lavender JS; Kinzelman JL
Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4967-79. PubMed ID: 19717179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus bacterial indicator response for ocean recreational water quality testing.
Noble RT; Moore DF; Leecaster MK; McGee CD; Weisberg SB
Water Res; 2003 Apr; 37(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 12600392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enterococci as indicators of Lake Michigan recreational water quality: comparison of two methodologies and their impacts on public health regulatory events.
Kinzelman J; Ng C; Jackson E; Gradus S; Bagley R
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2003 Jan; 69(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 12513981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bacterial indicators of risk of diarrhoeal disease from drinking-water in the Philippines.
Moe CL; Sobsey MD; Samsa GP; Mesolo V
Bull World Health Organ; 1991; 69(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 1893505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of enterococcal surface protein genes as markers of sewage contamination in tropical recreational waters.
Betancourt WQ; Fujioka RS
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(1):261-6. PubMed ID: 19587423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Techniques for Measuring Microbial Hazards in Bathing Waters: A Comparative Study.
Schang C; Henry R; Kolotelo PA; Prosser T; Crosbie N; Grant T; Cottam D; O'Brien P; Coutts S; Deletic A; McCarthy DT
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155848. PubMed ID: 27213772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decay of intestinal enterococci concentrations in high-energy estuarine and coastal waters: towards real-time T90 values for modelling faecal indicators in recreational waters.
Kay D; Stapleton CM; Wyer MD; McDonald AT; Crowther J; Paul N; Jones K; Francis C; Watkins J; Wilkinson J; Humphrey N; Lin B; Yang L; Falconer RA; Gardner S
Water Res; 2005 Feb; 39(4):655-67. PubMed ID: 15707639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
