1399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20009604)
1. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading.
Assad AS; Hassan SA; Shawky YM; Badawy MM
Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):212-23. PubMed ID: 17563512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability and marginal bone level measurements of unsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures: a 1-year randomized prospective clinical study comparing early and conventional loading protocols.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Tumer C; Yenigul M; Avci M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 16958688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures on Brånemark implants.
Turkyilmaz I
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 16489951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures retained with milled bars: maxillary anterior versus maxillary posterior concept--a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 18548933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems.
Payne AG; Solomons YF
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report.
Krennmair G; Ulm C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 11280368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Van 't Hof MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 14696664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Sütö D; Seemann R; Piehslinger E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 21504478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of prefabricated bar design on the success of overdentures stabilized by implants.
Wright PS; Watson RM; Heath MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 7615321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate loading of two implants with a mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a new treatment protocol.
Stoker GT; Wismeijer D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 19681940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
