These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20009939)

  • 1. Ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring: a comparison between antimony, ISFET, and glass pH electrodes.
    Hemmink GJ; Weusten BL; Oors J; Bredenoord AJ; Timmer R; Smout AJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 May; 22(5):572-7. PubMed ID: 20009939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Slimline vs. glass pH electrodes: what degree of accuracy should we expect?
    Pandolfino JE; Ghosh S; Zhang Q; Heath M; Bombeck T; Kahrilas PJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Jan; 23(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 16393314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Basic principles of pH registration.
    Emde C; Hopert R; Riecken EO
    Neth J Med; 1989 Mar; 34 Suppl():S3-9. PubMed ID: 2725802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.
    López-Alonso M; Moya MJ; Cabo JA; Ribas J; del Carmen Macías M; Silny J; Sifrim D
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e299-308. PubMed ID: 16831894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glass and antimony electrodes for long-term pH monitoring: a dynamic in vitro comparison.
    Geus WP; Smout AJ; Kooiman JC; Lamers CB; Gues JW
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1995 Jan; 7(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 7866807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with therapy-resistant reflux symptoms: 'on' or 'off' proton pump inhibitor?
    Hemmink GJ; Bredenoord AJ; Weusten BL; Monkelbaan JF; Timmer R; Smout AJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 103(10):2446-53. PubMed ID: 18684197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of reflux frequency during prolonged multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring on and off acid suppression therapy.
    Blonski W; Vela MF; Castell DO
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2009 Oct; 43(9):816-20. PubMed ID: 19398927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring: experience in The Netherlands.
    Klinkenberg-Knol EC; Ogilvie AC; Meuwissen SG
    Neth J Med; 1989 Mar; 34 Suppl():S40-54. PubMed ID: 2657460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Esophageal impedance-pH monitoring.
    Sifrim D; Fornari F
    Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Mar; 40(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 18082474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual site ambulatory pH monitoring: a probe across the lower esophageal sphincter does not induce gastroesophageal reflux.
    Decktor DL; Krawet SH; Rodriguez SL; Robinson M; Castell DO
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1162-6. PubMed ID: 8651164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between gastric pH and gastro-oesophageal reflux contents: ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring results.
    Roman S; Serraj I; Damon H; Mion F
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2007 Jul; 19(7):562-8. PubMed ID: 17593137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers.
    Shay S; Tutuian R; Sifrim D; Vela M; Wise J; Balaji N; Zhang X; Adhami T; Murray J; Peters J; Castell D
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1037-43. PubMed ID: 15180722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review article: oesophageal pH monitoring--technologies, interpretation and correlation with clinical outcomes.
    Kahrilas PJ; Pandolfino JE
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():2-9. PubMed ID: 16303031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous comparison of 24-hour intragastric pH recording using glass and antimony electrodes in man.
    Angerer M; Koelzow H; Londong W
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():38-45. PubMed ID: 2225518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Bravo wireless and Digitrapper catheter-based pH monitoring systems for measuring esophageal acid exposure.
    Pandolfino JE; Schreiner MA; Lee TJ; Zhang Q; Boniquit C; Kahrilas PJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jul; 100(7):1466-76. PubMed ID: 15984967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oesophageal pH monitoring using the Bravo catheter-free radio capsule.
    Gillies RS; Stratford JM; Booth MI; Dehn TC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jan; 19(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 17206078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Normal values and day-to-day variability of 24-h ambulatory oesophageal impedance-pH monitoring in a Belgian-French cohort of healthy subjects.
    Zerbib F; des Varannes SB; Roman S; Pouderoux P; Artigue F; Chaput U; Mion F; Caillol F; Verin E; Bommelaer G; Ducrotté P; Galmiche JP; Sifrim D
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Nov; 22(10):1011-21. PubMed ID: 16268977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review article: The measurement of non-acid gastro-oesophageal reflux.
    Smout AJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Dec; 26 Suppl 2():7-12. PubMed ID: 18081643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 48-hour wireless oesophageal pH-monitoring in children: are two days better than one?
    Gunnarsdóttir A; Stenström P; Arnbjörnsson E
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2007 Dec; 17(6):378-81. PubMed ID: 18072019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 24-h recording of intragastric pH: technical aspects and clinical relevance.
    van Herwaarden MA; Samsom M; Smout AJ
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1999; 230():9-16. PubMed ID: 10499456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.