These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Efficacy of protocol implementation on incidence of wound infection in colorectal operations. Hedrick TL; Heckman JA; Smith RL; Sawyer RG; Friel CM; Foley EF J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Sep; 205(3):432-8. PubMed ID: 17765159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effectiveness of a clinical-decision-support system in improving compliance with cardiac-care quality measures and supporting resident training. Riggio JM; Sorokin R; Moxey ED; Mather P; Gould S; Kane GC Acad Med; 2009 Dec; 84(12):1719-26. PubMed ID: 19940579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An Effective Bundled Approach Reduces Surgical Site Infections in a High-Outlier Colorectal Unit. Gorgun E; Rencuzogullari A; Ozben V; Stocchi L; Fraser T; Benlice C; Hull T Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Jan; 61(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 29215475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Surgical Infection Prevention and Surgical Care Improvement Projects: promises and pitfalls. Bratzler DW Am Surg; 2006 Nov; 72(11):1010-6; discussion 1021-30, 1133-48. PubMed ID: 17120942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ALEXIS O-Ring wound retractor vs conventional wound protection for the prevention of surgical site infections in colorectal resections(1). Cheng KP; Roslani AC; Sehha N; Kueh JH; Law CW; Chong HY; Arumugam K Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jun; 14(6):e346-51. PubMed ID: 22568647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measurement and feedback of infection control process measures in the intensive care unit: Impact on compliance. Berhe M; Edmond MB; Bearman G Am J Infect Control; 2006 Oct; 34(8):537-9. PubMed ID: 17015162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implementation of a real-time compliance dashboard to help reduce SICU ventilator-associated pneumonia with the ventilator bundle. Zaydfudim V; Dossett LA; Starmer JM; Arbogast PG; Feurer ID; Ray WA; May AK; Pinson CW Arch Surg; 2009 Jul; 144(7):656-62. PubMed ID: 19620546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement. Ingraham AM; Cohen ME; Bilimoria KY; Dimick JB; Richards KE; Raval MV; Fleisher LA; Hall BL; Ko CY J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Dec; 211(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 21109157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality Improvement Initiatives in Colorectal Surgery: Value of Physician Feedback. Waters JA; Francone T; Marcello PW; Roberts PL; Schoetz DJ; Read TE; Stafford C; Ricciardi R Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Feb; 60(2):213-218. PubMed ID: 28059918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mutual reporting of process and outcomes enhances quality outcomes for colon and rectal resections. Galandiuk S; Rao MK; Heine MF; Scherm MJ; Polk HC Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):833-41. PubMed ID: 15467669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Macro vs micro level surgical quality improvement: a regional collaborative demonstrates the case for a national NSQIP initiative. Tepas JJ; Kerwin AJ; deVilla J; Nussbaum MS J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Apr; 218(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 24491246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Statin use and the risk of surgical site infections in elderly patients undergoing elective surgery. Daneman N; Thiruchelvam D; Redelmeier DA Arch Surg; 2009 Oct; 144(10):938-45. PubMed ID: 19841362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Antiobiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infections. Salkind AR; Rao KC Am Fam Physician; 2011 Mar; 83(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 21391526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of a quality improvement intervention on the incidence of surgical site infection in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: Pre-test-post-test design. Horgan S; Hegarty J; Andrews E; Hooton C; Drennan J J Clin Nurs; 2023 Aug; 32(15-16):4932-4946. PubMed ID: 36924125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery. Bratzler DW; Hunt DR Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Aug; 43(3):322-30. PubMed ID: 16804848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surgical site infections in a "high outlier" institution: are colorectal surgeons to blame? Wick EC; Vogel JD; Church JM; Remzi F; Fazio VW Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Mar; 52(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 19333034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A multidisciplinary approach improves infection rates in pediatric spine surgery. Ballard MR; Miller NH; Nyquist AC; Elise B; Baulesh DM; Erickson MA J Pediatr Orthop; 2012; 32(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 22411332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effectiveness of a care bundle to reduce surgical site infections in patients having open colorectal surgery. Tanner J; Kiernan M; Hilliam R; Davey S; Collins E; Wood T; Ball J; Leaper D Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Apr; 98(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 26924481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The New England colorectal cancer quality project: a prospective multi-institutional feasibility study. Hyman NH; Ko CY; Cataldo PA; Cohen JL; Roberts PL J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Jan; 202(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16377495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]