BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20011240)

  • 1. Feature selection and classification of MAQC-II breast cancer and multiple myeloma microarray gene expression data.
    Liu Q; Sung AH; Chen Z; Liu J; Huang X; Deng Y
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8250. PubMed ID: 20011240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gene selection and classification for cancer microarray data based on machine learning and similarity measures.
    Liu Q; Sung AH; Chen Z; Liu J; Chen L; Qiao M; Wang Z; Huang X; Deng Y
    BMC Genomics; 2011 Dec; 12 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S1. PubMed ID: 22369383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of feature selection and classification for MALDI-MS data.
    Liu Q; Sung AH; Qiao M; Chen Z; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Huang X; Deng Y
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Jul; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 19594880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recursive cluster elimination (RCE) for classification and feature selection from gene expression data.
    Yousef M; Jung S; Showe LC; Showe MK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():144. PubMed ID: 17474999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing the prediction of IDC breast cancer staging from gene expression profiles using hybrid feature selection methods and deep learning architecture.
    Kishore A; Venkataramana L; Prasad DVV; Mohan A; Jha B
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Nov; 61(11):2895-2919. PubMed ID: 37530887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recursive feature selection with significant variables of support vectors.
    Tsai CA; Huang CH; Chang CW; Chen CH
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():712542. PubMed ID: 22927888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The feature selection bias problem in relation to high-dimensional gene data.
    Krawczuk J; Łukaszuk T
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 Jan; 66():63-71. PubMed ID: 26674595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of RNA-Seq data with heterogeneous microarray data for breast cancer profiling.
    Castillo D; Gálvez JM; Herrera LJ; Román BS; Rojas F; Rojas I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):506. PubMed ID: 29157215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
    Zeng T; Liu J
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction potential of candidate biomarker sets identified and validated on gene expression data from multiple datasets.
    Gormley M; Dampier W; Ertel A; Karacali B; Tozeren A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 8():415. PubMed ID: 17963508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel gene selection algorithm for cancer classification using microarray datasets.
    Alanni R; Hou J; Azzawi H; Xiang Y
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 30646919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selecting a single model or combining multiple models for microarray-based classifier development?--a comparative analysis based on large and diverse datasets generated from the MAQC-II project.
    Chen M; Shi L; Kelly R; Perkins R; Fang H; Tong W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Oct; 12 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S3. PubMed ID: 22166133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of batch effect removal methods for enhancement of prediction performance using MAQC-II microarray gene expression data.
    Luo J; Schumacher M; Scherer A; Sanoudou D; Megherbi D; Davison T; Shi T; Tong W; Shi L; Hong H; Zhao C; Elloumi F; Shi W; Thomas R; Lin S; Tillinghast G; Liu G; Zhou Y; Herman D; Li Y; Deng Y; Fang H; Bushel P; Woods M; Zhang J
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2010 Aug; 10(4):278-91. PubMed ID: 20676067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Win percentage: a novel measure for assessing the suitability of machine classifiers for biological problems.
    Parry RM; Phan JH; Wang MD
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S7. PubMed ID: 22536905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of different machine learning methods on microarray gene expression data.
    Pirooznia M; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Deng Y
    BMC Genomics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. PubMed ID: 18366602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains.
    Inza I; Larrañaga P; Blanco R; Cerrolaza AJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 Jun; 31(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 15219288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feature selection and nearest centroid classification for protein mass spectrometry.
    Levner I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():68. PubMed ID: 15788095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximizing biomarker discovery by minimizing gene signatures.
    Chang C; Wang J; Zhao C; Fostel J; Tong W; Bushel PR; Deng Y; Pusztai L; Symmans WF; Shi T
    BMC Genomics; 2011 Dec; 12 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S6. PubMed ID: 22369133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using rule-based machine learning for candidate disease gene prioritization and sample classification of cancer gene expression data.
    Glaab E; Bacardit J; Garibaldi JM; Krasnogor N
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e39932. PubMed ID: 22808075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. k-Nearest neighbor models for microarray gene expression analysis and clinical outcome prediction.
    Parry RM; Jones W; Stokes TH; Phan JH; Moffitt RA; Fang H; Shi L; Oberthuer A; Fischer M; Tong W; Wang MD
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2010 Aug; 10(4):292-309. PubMed ID: 20676068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.