These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20011643)

  • 1. Patients' positive identification systems.
    Pagliaro P; Turdo R; Capuzzo E
    Blood Transfus; 2009 Oct; 7(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 20011643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transfusion recipient identification.
    Pagliaro P; Rebulla P
    Vox Sang; 2006 Aug; 91(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 16907869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of an identification system based on biometric data for patients requiring transfusions guarantees transfusion safety and traceability.
    Bennardello F; Fidone C; Cabibbo S; Calabrese S; Garozzo G; Cassarino G; Antolino A; Tavolino G; Zisa N; Falla C; Drago G; Di Stefano G; Bonomo P
    Blood Transfus; 2009 Jul; 7(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 19657483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement in transfusion safety using a specially designed transfusion wristband.
    Lau FY; Wong R; Chui CH; Ng E; Cheng G
    Transfus Med; 2000 Jun; 10(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 10849382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Computer management to avoid errors in transfusion].
    Takahashi K
    Rinsho Byori; 2003 Jan; 51(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12652693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to verify patient identity and blood product compatibility using an electronic bedside transfusion system.
    Staples S; O'Callaghan C; Pavord S; Staves J; Murphy MF
    Transfusion; 2020 Sep; 60(9):2153-2155. PubMed ID: 32830320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causes of failure of a barcode-based pretransfusion check at the bedside: experience in a university hospital.
    Ohsaka A; Kobayashi M; Abe K
    Transfus Med; 2008 Aug; 18(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 18783580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To err is human nature. Can transfusion errors due to human factors ever be eliminated?
    Lau FY; Cheng G
    Clin Chim Acta; 2001 Nov; 313(1-2):59-67. PubMed ID: 11694240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Piloting the use of 2D barcode and patient safety-software in an Australian tertiary hospital setting.
    Miller K; Akers C; Magrin G; Whitehead S; Davis AK
    Vox Sang; 2013 Aug; 105(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 23600799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized bar code-based blood identification systems and near-miss transfusion episodes and transfusion errors.
    Nuttall GA; Abenstein JP; Stubbs JR; Santrach P; Ereth MH; Johnson PM; Douglas E; Oliver WC
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2013 Apr; 88(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 23541010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved traceability and transfusion safety with a new portable computerised system in a hospital with intermediate transfusion activity.
    Uríz MJ; Antelo ML; Zalba S; Ugalde N; Pena E; Corcoz A
    Blood Transfus; 2011 Apr; 9(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 21251464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bar code technology improves positive patient identification and transfusion safety.
    Sandler SG; Langeberg A; Dohnalek L
    Dev Biol (Basel); 2005; 120():19-24. PubMed ID: 16050151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. End-to-end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknesses.
    Davies A; Staves J; Kay J; Casbard A; Murphy MF
    Transfusion; 2006 Mar; 46(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 16533276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Addressing sample identification errors in a multispecialty tertiary care hospital in Bangalore.
    Sindhulina C; Joseph NJ
    Vox Sang; 2014 Aug; 107(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 24602024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Yes, we should keep ABO agglutination test within bedside transfusion checks].
    Daurat G
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2008 Nov; 15(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 18930425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A computer-assisted transfusion management system and changed transfusion practices contribute to appropriate management of blood components.
    Ohsaka A; Abe K; Ohsawa T; Miyake N; Sugita S; Tojima I
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1730-8. PubMed ID: 18482189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving transfusion safety: implementation of a comprehensive computerized bar code-based tracking system for detecting and preventing errors.
    Askeland RW; McGrane S; Levitt JS; Dane SK; Greene DL; Vandeberg JA; Walker K; Porcella A; Herwaldt LA; Carmen LT; Kemp JD
    Transfusion; 2008 Jul; 48(7):1308-17. PubMed ID: 18346018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Present state of transfusion errors].
    Murakami J
    Rinsho Byori; 2003 Jan; 51(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 12652690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting the right blood to the right patient: the contribution of near-miss event reporting and barrier analysis.
    Kaplan HS
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2005 Nov; 12(5):380-4. PubMed ID: 16316757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementation of an electronic identification system in the setting of perioperative autologous cell salvage transfusion: Experience at a university hospital.
    Furuta Y; Nakamura Y; Tokida M; Ichikawa K; Okada H; Hayashida M; Okubo M; Ohsaka A
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2022 Feb; 61(1):103281. PubMed ID: 34593333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.