199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20013373)
41. Increasing the mass accuracy of high-resolution LC-MS data using background ions: a case study on the LTQ-Orbitrap.
Scheltema RA; Kamleh A; Wildridge D; Ebikeme C; Watson DG; Barrett MP; Jansen RC; Breitling R
Proteomics; 2008 Nov; 8(22):4647-56. PubMed ID: 18937253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. MapQuant: open-source software for large-scale protein quantification.
Leptos KC; Sarracino DA; Jaffe JD; Krastins B; Church GM
Proteomics; 2006 Mar; 6(6):1770-82. PubMed ID: 16470651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Automated 20 kpsi RPLC-MS and MS/MS with chromatographic peak capacities of 1000-1500 and capabilities in proteomics and metabolomics.
Shen Y; Zhang R; Moore RJ; Kim J; Metz TO; Hixson KK; Zhao R; Livesay EA; Udseth HR; Smith RD
Anal Chem; 2005 May; 77(10):3090-100. PubMed ID: 15889897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Computational methods for the comparative quantification of proteins in label-free LCn-MS experiments.
Wong JW; Sullivan MJ; Cagney G
Brief Bioinform; 2008 Mar; 9(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 17905794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Virtual Expert Mass Spectrometrist v3.0: an integrated tool for proteome analysis.
Matthiesen R
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 367():121-38. PubMed ID: 17185773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An evaluation, comparison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available MS/MS search algorithms: sensitivity and specificity analysis.
Kapp EA; Schütz F; Connolly LM; Chakel JA; Meza JE; Miller CA; Fenyo D; Eng JK; Adkins JN; Omenn GS; Simpson RJ
Proteomics; 2005 Aug; 5(13):3475-90. PubMed ID: 16047398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Added value for tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomics data validation through isoelectric focusing of peptides.
Heller M; Ye M; Michel PE; Morier P; Stalder D; Jünger MA; Aebersold R; Reymond F; Rossier JS
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2273-82. PubMed ID: 16335976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. MassChroQ: a versatile tool for mass spectrometry quantification.
Valot B; Langella O; Nano E; Zivy M
Proteomics; 2011 Sep; 11(17):3572-7. PubMed ID: 21751374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A tool to visualize and evaluate data obtained by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry.
Li XJ; Pedrioli PG; Eng J; Martin D; Yi EC; Lee H; Aebersold R
Anal Chem; 2004 Jul; 76(13):3856-60. PubMed ID: 15228367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. VEMS 3.0: algorithms and computational tools for tandem mass spectrometry based identification of post-translational modifications in proteins.
Matthiesen R; Trelle MB; Højrup P; Bunkenborg J; Jensen ON
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2338-47. PubMed ID: 16335983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Processing methods for differential analysis of LC/MS profile data.
Katajamaa M; Oresic M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():179. PubMed ID: 16026613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. swissPIT: a novel approach for pipelined analysis of mass spectrometry data.
Quandt A; Hernandez P; Masselot A; Hernandez C; Maffioletti S; Pautasso C; Appel RD; Lisacek F
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jun; 24(11):1416-7. PubMed ID: 18436540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Gene model detection using mass spectrometry.
Nanduri B; Wang N; Lawrence ML; Bridges SM; Burgess SC
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 604():137-44. PubMed ID: 20013369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Data pre-processing in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
Zhang X; Asara JM; Adamec J; Ouzzani M; Elmagarmid AK
Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(21):4054-9. PubMed ID: 16150809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Fast and Efficient XML Data Access for Next-Generation Mass Spectrometry.
Röst HL; Schmitt U; Aebersold R; Malmström L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125108. PubMed ID: 25927999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Retention time alignment algorithms for LC/MS data must consider non-linear shifts.
Podwojski K; Fritsch A; Chamrad DC; Paul W; Sitek B; Stühler K; Mutzel P; Stephan C; Meyer HE; Urfer W; Ickstadt K; Rahnenführer J
Bioinformatics; 2009 Mar; 25(6):758-64. PubMed ID: 19176558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparative LC-MS: a landscape of peaks and valleys.
America AH; Cordewener JH
Proteomics; 2008 Feb; 8(4):731-49. PubMed ID: 18297651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A simple peak detection and label-free quantitation algorithm for chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Aoshima K; Takahashi K; Ikawa M; Kimura T; Fukuda M; Tanaka S; Parry HE; Fujita Y; Yoshizawa AC; Utsunomiya S; Kajihara S; Tanaka K; Oda Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):376. PubMed ID: 25420746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Bioinformatics for LC-MS/MS-based proteomics.
Jacob RJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 658():61-91. PubMed ID: 20839098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A case study on the comparison of different software tools for automated quantification of peptides.
Colaert N; Vandekerckhove J; Martens L; Gevaert K
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 753():373-98. PubMed ID: 21604136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
