These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20013455)

  • 41. [Inferiority in normal and anxious populations].
    Yao SN; Cottraux J
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 12232541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Examination of the known-groups validity of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale.
    Heimberg RG; Holaway RM
    Depress Anxiety; 2007; 24(7):447-54. PubMed ID: 17120297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Psychological profile of dysfunctional dysphonia.
    Lauriello M; Cozza K; Rossi A; Di Rienzo L; Coen Tirelli G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Dec; 23(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 15198050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The structure of worry: relations between positive/negative personality characteristics and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire.
    Olatunji BO; Schottenbauer MA; Rodriguez BF; Glass CR; Arnkoff DB
    J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(4):540-53. PubMed ID: 16962285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The looming maladaptive style predicts shared variance in anxiety disorder symptoms: further support for a cognitive model of vulnerability to anxiety.
    Williams NL; Shahar G; Riskind JH; Joiner TE
    J Anxiety Disord; 2005; 19(2):157-75. PubMed ID: 15533702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Inventory of Suicide Orientation-30: further validation with adolescent psychiatric inpatients.
    Osman A; Gutierrez PM; Barrios FX; Bagge CL; Kopper BA; Linden S
    J Clin Psychol; 2005 Apr; 61(4):481-97. PubMed ID: 15503304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Gender differences in obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions.
    Labad J; Menchon JM; Alonso P; Segalas C; Jimenez S; Jaurrieta N; Leckman JF; Vallejo J
    Depress Anxiety; 2008; 25(10):832-8. PubMed ID: 17436312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Factor structure and construct validity of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index among island Puerto Ricans.
    Cintrón JA; Carter MM; Suchday S; Sbrocco T; Gray J
    J Anxiety Disord; 2005; 19(1):51-68. PubMed ID: 15488367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Perfectionism in depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder and eating disorders.
    Sassaroli S; Lauro LJ; Ruggiero GM; Mauri MC; Vinai P; Frost R
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Jun; 46(6):757-65. PubMed ID: 18394588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On the hierarchical structure of mood and anxiety disorders: confirmatory evidence and elaboration of a model of temperament markers.
    Sellbom M; Ben-Porath YS; Bagby RM
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2008 Aug; 117(3):576-90. PubMed ID: 18729610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A bifactor model of disgust proneness: examination of the Disgust Emotion Scale.
    Olatunji BO; Ebesutani C; Reise SP
    Assessment; 2015 Apr; 22(2):248-62. PubMed ID: 25006025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The PANAS structure revisited: on the validity of a bifactor model in community and forensic samples.
    Leue A; Beauducel A
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Mar; 23(1):215-25. PubMed ID: 21280952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 among treatment-seeking smokers.
    Farris SG; DiBello AM; Allan NP; Hogan J; Schmidt NB; Zvolensky MJ
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Sep; 27(3):1123-1128. PubMed ID: 25894700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The utility of the bifactor model in understanding unique components of anxiety sensitivity in a South Korean sample.
    Ebesutani C; Kim M; Park HH
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2016 Aug; 22():116-23. PubMed ID: 27520911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Examining the Factor Structure of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 in a Turkish Sample: The Factor Structure of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3.
    Yılmaz Koğar E
    Psychol Rep; 2022 Dec; 125(6):3289-3312. PubMed ID: 34412544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Resolving Uncertainty About the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12: Application of Modern Psychometric Strategies.
    Hale W; Richmond M; Bennett J; Berzins T; Fields A; Weber D; Beck M; Osman A
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 26542301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Anxiety Sensitivity Index--Revised: confirmatory factor analyses, structural invariance in Caucasian and African American samples, and score reliability and validity.
    Arnau RC; Broman-Fulks JJ; Green BA; Berman ME
    Assessment; 2009 Jun; 16(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 19104031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 in an Italian Community Sample.
    Ghisi M; Bottesi G; Altoè G; Razzetti E; Melli G; Sica C
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():160. PubMed ID: 26909057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Factor structure of the childhood anxiety sensitivity index.
    Silverman WK; Ginsburg GS; Goedhart AW
    Behav Res Ther; 1999 Sep; 37(9):903-17. PubMed ID: 10458052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Back to "the Future": Evidence of a Bifactor Solution for Scores on the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale.
    McKay MT; Morgan GB; van Exel NJ; Worrell FC
    J Pers Assess; 2015; 97(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 25634248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.