401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20013505)
41. Medwaves editorial history, policies and guidelines: 2. Editorial policies.
Bachelet VC
Medwave; 2017 Apr; 17(3):e6909. PubMed ID: 28430770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Protection priority.
Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7569):290. PubMed ID: 26381947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Ethics and animals.
Zak S
Atl Mon; 1989 Mar; 263(3):68-74. PubMed ID: 11659112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Responsibilities of the editor.
Punjabi PP
Perfusion; 2010 May; 25(3):113-4. PubMed ID: 20581024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Open to debate: moral consideration and the lab monkey.
Hale B
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jun; 8(6):53-4. PubMed ID: 18726784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Moral standards and scientific integrity in journal editorship.
Daly J; Robinson P
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2011 Oct; 35(5):403-4. PubMed ID: 21973242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
Newton DP
Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Scientific misconduct, stem cells, and the way ahead.
Lindblad WJ
Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(2):101. PubMed ID: 16630096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Recent changes in research ethics guidelines and publication.
Leslie GD
Aust Crit Care; 2008 May; 21(2):81-2. PubMed ID: 18466826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Publication ethics--responsibility of all].
Staff A; Rørtveit G
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Feb; 130(3):259. PubMed ID: 20160762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The ARRIVE guidelines, a welcome improvement to standards for reporting animal research.
Danos O; Davies K; Lehn P; Mulligan R
J Gene Med; 2010 Jul; 12(7):559-60. PubMed ID: 20603891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Good science does not sell easily. Lakartidningen's ambition level must be adapted to already existing international demands].
Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Bågedahl-Strindlund M; Eberhard D; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Ostergren J
Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(51-52):5166-7. PubMed ID: 12572310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Researchers commit to greater openness on research involving animals in the UK.
Torjesen I
BMJ; 2014 May; 348():g3305. PubMed ID: 25134140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Animal minds and neuroimaging--bridging the gap between science and ethics?
Buller T
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2014 Apr; 23(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 24495745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Animals in research: the case for experimentation.
King FA
Psychol Today; 1984 Sep; 18(9):56-8. PubMed ID: 11650675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Editorial policy: industry funding and editorial independence.
MacDonald N; Downie J
CMAJ; 2006 Jun; 174(13):1817, 1819. PubMed ID: 16785448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. One hundred years of animal welfare regulation and of experiments with animals in Germany, effects and reasons.
Gärtner K
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):106-13. PubMed ID: 11649990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
