498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20013508)
1. Can journal editors police animal welfare? Three Es for three Rs in scientific journals.
Marusic A
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):66-7. PubMed ID: 20013508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response to open peer commentaries on "Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3Rs".
Osborne NJ; Payne D; Newman ML
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):W3. PubMed ID: 20013483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific autonomy and the 3Rs.
Rollin BE
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):62-4. PubMed ID: 20013506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Underdetermined interests: scientific 'goods' and animal welfare.
Degeling C; Johnson J
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):64-6. PubMed ID: 20013507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Journal editorial policies, animal welfare, and the 3Rs.
Osborne NJ; Payne D; Newman ML
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):55-9. PubMed ID: 20013503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A question of ethics--publication policy and animals in research.
Silbergeld E
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):61-2. PubMed ID: 20013505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Animal research. Journal editors could help raise profile of three Rs of animal research.
Hawkins P
BMJ; 2001 Jun; 322(7302):1603-4. PubMed ID: 11458903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Information on the 3Rs in animal research publications is crucial.
Whittall H
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Dec; 9(12):60-1. PubMed ID: 20013504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reporting of studies using animal and human subjects in APS journals: how the society protects authors from ethical minefields.
Yates B; Barrett KE
Physiologist; 2012 Feb; 55(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 22439361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry editorial policies and ethical guidelines.
Roth KA
J Histochem Cytochem; 2006 Feb; 54(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 16418501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Specification of laboratory animal use in scientific articles: current low detail in the journals' instructions for authors and some proposals.
Alfaro V
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 27(7):495-502. PubMed ID: 16258595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proposal for the composition of animal experiments committees in the Netherlands.
van der Valk J; Swart S
ALTEX; 2006; 23(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 17086349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory animal studies: poor design + faulty analysis = unnecessary suffering.
Balls M
Altern Lab Anim; 1994; 22(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 11659930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical principles and guidelines for scientific experiments on animals.
;
Altern Lab Anim; 1997; 25(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 11654996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
Newton DP
Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shock supports the use of animal research reporting guidelines.
Reynolds P; Wall P; van Griensven M; McConnell K; Lang C; Buchman T
Shock; 2012 Jul; 38(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 22706019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Who will start the 3Rs ball rolling for animal welfare?
Buck V
Nature; 2007 Apr; 446(7138):856. PubMed ID: 17443160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.
Landy DC; Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Sharp RR
Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7. PubMed ID: 19318788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Education and training: a basis for the introduction of the three Rs alternatives into animal research.
van Zutphen BF; van der Valk JB
Altern Lab Anim; 1995; 23(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 11660272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards ethically improved animal experimentation in the study of animal reproduction.
Blache D; Martin GB; Maloney SK
Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Jul; 43 Suppl 2():8-14. PubMed ID: 18638100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
