These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20013515)

  • 1. Sex differences in the processing of flankers.
    Stoet G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 20013515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Properties of spatial attention in conscious and nonconscious visual information processing.
    Tapia E; Breitmeyer BG; Broyles EC
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):426-31. PubMed ID: 20656519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some considerations of two alleged kinds of selective attention.
    Keren G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1976 Dec; 105(4):349-74. PubMed ID: 1003122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An fMRI study of sex differences in regional activation to a verbal and a spatial task.
    Gur RC; Alsop D; Glahn D; Petty R; Swanson CL; Maldjian JA; Turetsky BI; Detre JA; Gee J; Gur RE
    Brain Lang; 2000 Sep; 74(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 10950912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative and qualitative sex differences in spatial navigation.
    Lövdén M; Herlitz A; Schellenbach M; Grossman-Hutter B; Krüger A; Lindenberger U
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Oct; 48(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 17877549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of alertness on spatial and nonspatial components of visual attention.
    Matthias E; Bublak P; Müller HJ; Schneider WX; Krummenacher J; Finke K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):38-56. PubMed ID: 20121294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distance and ratio effects in the flanker task are due to different mechanisms.
    Mattler U
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1745-63. PubMed ID: 16945858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Large visuospatial sex difference in line judgment: possible role of attentional factors.
    Collaer ML; Nelson JD
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 12027388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (IOR) on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people.
    Chen Q; Zhang M; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 16859649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive interference and aging: insights from a spatial stimulus-response consistency task.
    Juncos-Rabadán O; Pereiro AX; Facal D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 17601480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex differences in spatial ability: a lateralization of function approach.
    Rilea SL; Roskos-Ewoldsen B; Boles D
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Dec; 56(3):332-43. PubMed ID: 15522772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Higher free testosterone level is associated with faster visual processing and more flanker interference in older men.
    Van Strien JW; Weber RF; Burdorf A; Bangma C
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2009 May; 34(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 19042092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial and temporal processing in healthy aging: implications for perceptions of driving skills.
    Conlon E; Herkes K
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Jul; 15(4):446-70. PubMed ID: 18584339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A lateralization of function approach to sex differences in spatial ability: a reexamination.
    Rilea SL
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jul; 67(2):168-82. PubMed ID: 18291568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between cognitive ability and positive and negative priming in identity and spatial priming tasks.
    Koshino H; Boese GA; Ferraro FR
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Oct; 127(4):372-82. PubMed ID: 11110000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies of flanker coprocessing in single and dual tasks.
    Hübner R; Lehle C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 17311482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.