These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20013876)

  • 1. How much do family physicians involve pregnant women in decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome?
    Gagnon S; Labrecque M; Njoya M; Rousseau F; St-Jacques S; Légaré F
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Feb; 30(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20013876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a survey of willingness in women and family physicians to engage in shared decision-making.
    Légaré F; St-Jacques S; Gagnon S; Njoya M; Brisson M; Frémont P; Rousseau F
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Apr; 31(4):319-26. PubMed ID: 21268046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.
    Elwyn G; Edwards A; Wensing M; Hood K; Atwell C; Grol R
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Apr; 12(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 12679504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shared decision making: the reliability of the OPTION scale in Italy.
    Goss C; Fontanesi S; Mazzi MA; Del Piccolo L; Rimondini M; Elwyn G; Zimmermann C
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jun; 66(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 17433603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The provision of information and informed decision-making on prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a questionnaire- and register-based survey in a non-selected population.
    Schoonen M; Wildschut H; Essink-Bot ML; Peters I; Steegers E; de Koning H
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jun; 87(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 22030253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pregnant women's attitudes toward amniocentesis before receiving Down syndrome screening results.
    Brajenović-Milić B; Babić I; Ristić S; Vraneković J; Brumini G; Kapović M
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 18180167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: women's involvement in decision-making and their attitudes to screening.
    Seror V; Ville Y
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Feb; 29(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 19123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How important is consent in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in France? Information and consent evaluation in maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: a French study.
    Favre R; Duchange N; Vayssière C; Kohler M; Bouffard N; Hunsinger MC; Kohler A; Mager C; Neumann M; Vayssière C; Viville B; Hervé C; Moutel G
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Mar; 27(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 17238219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Information about prenatal screening for Down syndrome: ethnic differences in knowledge.
    Fransen MP; Hajo Wildschut ; Vogel I; Mackenbach J; Steegers E; Essink-Bot ML
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Nov; 77(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 19409748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 1. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down syndrome. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.
    Dick PT
    CMAJ; 1996 Feb; 154(4):465-79. PubMed ID: 8630836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The assessment of depressive patients' involvement in decision making in audio-taped primary care consultations.
    Loh A; Simon D; Hennig K; Hennig B; Härter M; Elwyn G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 16872794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The utility assessment of Chinese pregnant women towards the birth of a baby with Down syndrome compared to a procedure-related miscarriage.
    Chan YM; Leung TN; Leung TY; Fung TY; Chan LW; Lau TK
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Sep; 26(9):819-24. PubMed ID: 16832829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument.
    Siriwardena AN; Edwards AG; Campion P; Freeman A; Elwyn G
    Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Nov; 56(532):857-62. PubMed ID: 17132353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethnic differences in determinants of participation and non-participation in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a theoretical framework.
    Fransen MP; Essink-Bot ML; Oenema A; Mackenbach JP; Steegers EA; Wildschut HI
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Oct; 27(10):938-50. PubMed ID: 17597492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome.
    Reid B; Sinclair M; Barr O; Dobbs F; Crealey G
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(11):1561-73. PubMed ID: 19783085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward shared decision making: using the OPTION scale to analyze resident-patient consultations in family medicine.
    Pellerin MA; Elwyn G; Rousseau M; Stacey D; Robitaille H; Légaré F
    Acad Med; 2011 Aug; 86(8):1010-8. PubMed ID: 21694569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applying decision analysis to facilitate informed decision making about prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.
    Bekker HL; Hewison J; Thornton JG
    Prenat Diagn; 2004 Apr; 24(4):265-75. PubMed ID: 15065100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived risk of prenatal diagnostic procedure-related miscarriage and Down syndrome among pregnant women.
    Caughey AB; Washington AE; Kuppermann M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 198(3):333.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18177830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments.
    Weiss MC; Peters TJ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jan; 70(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 17942270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.