These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20014553)

  • 1. Does providing previous results change the accuracy of cervical cytology?
    Davey E; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Clarke J; Thurloe J; Hyne S; Biro C
    Acta Cytol; 2009; 53(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 20014553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cytology reading times: a comparison between ThinPrep Imager and conventional methods.
    Davey E; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Chan SF; D'Assuncao J; Richards A; Farnsworth A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Sep; 35(9):550-4. PubMed ID: 17703458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA methylation in human papillomavirus-infected cervical cells is elevated in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and cancer.
    Kim MK; Lee IH; Lee KH; Lee YK; So KA; Hong SR; Hwang CS; Kee MK; Rhee JE; Kang C; Hur SY; Park JS; Kim TJ
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 27(2):e14. PubMed ID: 26768780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized crossover trial of PAPNET for primary cervical screening.
    Irwig L; Macaskill P; Farnsworth A; Wright RG; McCool J; Barratt A; Simpson JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 57(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 15019013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
    Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pap test accuracy and severity of squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Cobucci R; Maisonnette M; Macêdo E; Santos Filho FC; Rodovalho P; Nóbrega MM; Goncalves A
    Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):74-6. PubMed ID: 27146747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
    Sigurdsson K
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
    Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
    Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is there a role for the thinprep imaging system in reporting anal cytology?
    Margaret Roberts J; Jin F; Ekman D; Kay Adams M; Lindsay McDonald R; Kathleen Thurloe J; Richards A; Mary Poynten I; Law C; Kincaid Fairley C; John Hillman R; Tabrizi SN; Marie Cornall A; James Templeton D; Marie Garland S; Edwin Grulich A; Farnsworth A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 May; 44(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 26876374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of screening times between the ThinPrep Imager and conventional cytology.
    Boost T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Sep; 37(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 19459203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glandular Lesions of the Cervix in Clinical Practice: A Cytology, Histology, and Human Papillomavirus Correlation Study From 2 Institutions.
    Miller RA; Mody DR; Tams KC; Thrall MJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Nov; 139(11):1431-6. PubMed ID: 25951104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
    Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The performance of human papillomavirus high-risk DNA testing in the screening and diagnostic settings.
    Cárdenas-Turanzas M; Nogueras-Gonzalez GM; Scheurer ME; Adler-Storthz K; Benedet JL; Beck JR; Follen M; Cantor SB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Oct; 17(10):2865-71. PubMed ID: 18843032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pap smears with glandular cell abnormalities: Are they detected by rapid prescreening?
    Kanber Y; Charbonneau M; Auger M
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Dec; 123(12):739-44. PubMed ID: 26348845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Liquid-based cervical cytology ThinPrep screening in Hungary].
    Bak M; Séberné Éll M; Bóka M; Veleczki Z; Nyári T; Pete I; Szentirmay Z
    Orv Hetil; 2014 May; 155(18):708-14. PubMed ID: 24776385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing the accuracy of ThinPrep Pap tests and conventional Papanicolaou smears on the basis of the histologic diagnosis: a clinical study of women with cervical abnormalities.
    Park IA; Lee SN; Chae SW; Park KH; Kim JW; Lee HP
    Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 11480713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy.
    Fahey MT; Irwig L; Macaskill P
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Apr; 141(7):680-9. PubMed ID: 7702044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review.
    Loy CT; Irwig L
    JAMA; 2004 Oct; 292(13):1602-9. PubMed ID: 15467063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.