151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20014893)
1. Guidance for the classification of carcinogens under the Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
McGregor D; Boobis A; Binaglia M; Botham P; Hoffstadt L; Hubbard S; Petry T; Riley A; Schwartz D; Hennes C
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Mar; 40(3):245-85. PubMed ID: 20014893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advances in metals classification under the United Nations globally harmonized system of classification and labeling.
Skeaff J; Adams WJ; Rodriguez P; Brouwers T; Waeterschoot H
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Oct; 7(4):559-76. PubMed ID: 21425236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The development of the globally harmonized system (GHS) of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals.
Winder C; Azzi R; Wagner D
J Hazard Mater; 2005 Oct; 125(1-3):29-44. PubMed ID: 16039045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indicators as a tool for the evaluation of effective national implementation of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
Peterson PJ; bin Mokhtar M; Chang C; Krueger J
J Environ Manage; 2010 May; 91(5):1202-8. PubMed ID: 20116918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proposed changes in the classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area.
Neumann HG; Thielmann HW; Filser JG; Gelbke HP; Greim H; Kappus H; Norpoth KH; Reuter U; Vamvakas S; Wardenbach P; Wichmann HE
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Dec; 26(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 9441919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cancer risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate: application of the new U.S. EPA Risk Assessment Guidelines.
Doull J; Cattley R; Elcombe C; Lake BG; Swenberg J; Wilkinson C; Williams G; van Gemert M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Jun; 29(3):327-57. PubMed ID: 10388618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) and its implementation in Japan].
Miyagawa M
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2010 Jan; 65(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 20134103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guidance on classification for reproductive toxicity under the globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS).
Moore NP; Boogaard PJ; Bremer S; Buesen R; Edwards J; Fraysse B; Hallmark N; Hemming H; Langrand-Lerche C; McKee RH; Meisters ML; Parsons P; Politano V; Reader S; Ridgway P; Hennes C
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2013 Nov; 43(10):850-91. PubMed ID: 24274377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A classification framework and practical guidance for establishing a mode of action for chemical carcinogens.
Butterworth BE
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 45(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 16530901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing uncertainty in risk assessment by using specific knowledge to replace default options.
McClellan RO
Drug Metab Rev; 1996; 28(1-2):149-79. PubMed ID: 8744594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carcinogen classification systems: similarities and differences.
Sanner T; Dybing E; Kroese D; Roelfzema H; Hardeng S
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Apr; 23(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 8661331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical issues on the application of the GHS classification criteria for germ cell mutagens.
Morita T; Hayashi M; Nakajima M; Tanaka N; Tweats DJ; Morikawa K; Sofuni T
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 55(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 19505521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential human cancer risks from exposure to PCBs: a tale of two evaluations.
Golden R; Doull J; Waddell W; Mandel J
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2003; 33(5):543-80. PubMed ID: 14594106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Seveso II experience in the application of generic substance criteria to identify major hazard sites.
Wood MH
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Nov; 171(1-3):16-28. PubMed ID: 19632041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Issues in the design and interpretation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in rodents: approaches to dose selection.
Rhomberg LR; Baetcke K; Blancato J; Bus J; Cohen S; Conolly R; Dixit R; Doe J; Ekelman K; Fenner-Crisp P; Harvey P; Hattis D; Jacobs A; Jacobson-Kram D; Lewandowski T; Liteplo R; Pelkonen O; Rice J; Somers D; Turturro A; West W; Olin S
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(9):729-837. PubMed ID: 17957539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
