These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2001492)

  • 1. Effect of exposure time on the sorption of pesticide emulsifiable concentrates through microporous fabrics.
    Shaw A; Hill KR
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1991 Jan; 46(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 2001492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability in sorption of diazinon through microporous fabrics.
    Shaw A; Hill KR
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1990 Oct; 45(4):500-6. PubMed ID: 2279112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A reproducible method for the extraction of pesticide residues from fabrics.
    Easter EP; Leonas KK; DeJonge JO
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1983 Dec; 31(6):738-44. PubMed ID: 6661586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical model for predicting pesticide penetration in woven fabrics used for chemical protective clothing.
    Zhang X; Raheel M
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2003 Apr; 70(4):652-9. PubMed ID: 12677374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pesticide transmission in fabrics: effect of perspiration.
    Raheel M
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1991 Jun; 46(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 1863791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pesticide transmission in fabrics: effect of particulate soil.
    Raheel M
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1991 Jun; 46(6):845-51. PubMed ID: 1907514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The mechanism of pesticide transmission through apparel fabrics: a comparison of drop and spray exposure methodologies.
    Leonas KK
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 20(3):427-31. PubMed ID: 1859212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of fabric characteristics on pesticide penetration through selected apparel fabrics.
    Leonas KK; Easter EP; DeJonge JO
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1989 Aug; 43(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 2775891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Water-repellent, moisture-transport and agrochemicals-protection of protective clothing materials for applicator].
    Miki K
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1997 Jul; 44(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 9314707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Procedures to evaluate the efficiency of protective clothing worn by operators applying pesticide.
    Espanhol-Soares M; Nociti LA; Machado-Neto JG
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Oct; 57(8):1041-53. PubMed ID: 23813887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protective clothing for pesticide operators: part I--selection of a reference test chemical for penetration testing.
    Shaw A; Schiffelbein P
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2016; 22(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26327158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the pesticide capture efficiency of potential passive dosimeter materials.
    Kirchner LM; Taylor RA; Downer RA; Hall FR
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1996 Dec; 57(6):938-45. PubMed ID: 8875842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection of sorption material for tests of pesticide permeation through protective clothing fabrics.
    Krzemińska S; Nazimek T
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2004; 10(4):387-97. PubMed ID: 15598362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of gravimetric and gas chromatographic methods for assessing performance of textile materials against liquid pesticide penetration.
    Shaw A; Abbi R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2004; 10(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 15377410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protective clothing for pesticide operators: part II--data analysis of fabric characteristics.
    Shaw A; Schiffelbein P
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2016; 22(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 26327159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of different work clothing types for reducing skin exposure to pesticides during open field treatment.
    Protano C; Guidotti M; Vitali M
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009 Jul; 83(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 19424648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dermal exposure assessment of pesticide use: the case of sprayers in potato farms in the Colombian highlands.
    Lesmes-Fabian C; García-Santos G; Leuenberger F; Nuyttens D; Binder CR
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jul; 430():202-8. PubMed ID: 22652009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of single-layer clothing in preventing exposure from pesticide handling.
    Miguelino ES
    J Agromedicine; 2014; 19(4):373-83. PubMed ID: 25275403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pesticide exposure of applicators working in tea plantations.
    Wan H
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1990 Sep; 45(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 2257342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary evaluation of nonwoven chemically treated barrier fabrics for field testing of protective clothing for agricultural workers exposed to pesticides.
    Oakland BG; Dodd RB; Schabacker DJ; Clegg LX
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1992 Jul; 49(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 1392295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.