These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20015260)

  • 21. Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy.
    Burger J; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 16554118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Nexus between ecological risk assessment and natural resource damage assessment under CERCLA: introduction to a Society of Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryTechnical Workshop.
    Stahl RG; Gouguet R; Charters D; Clements W; Gala W; Haddad R; Helm R; Landis W; Maki A; Munns WR; Young D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):496-9. PubMed ID: 19545185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Novel roles for genetically modified plants in environmental protection.
    Macek T; Kotrba P; Svatos A; Novakova M; Demnerova K; Mackova M
    Trends Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18243383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern.
    Singh OV; Ghai S; Paul D; Jain RK
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16639559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ethical reflections on herbicide-resistant crops.
    Madsen KH; Sandøe P
    Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Mar; 61(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 15627240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multiplex PCR-based simultaneous amplification of selectable marker and reporter genes for the screening of genetically modified crops.
    Randhawa GJ; Chhabra R; Singh M
    J Agric Food Chem; 2009 Jun; 57(12):5167-72. PubMed ID: 19473001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk assessment of riparian plant invasions into protected areas.
    Foxcroft LC; Rouget M; Richardson DM
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):412-21. PubMed ID: 17391191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biological and biomedical aspects of genetically modified food.
    Celec P; Kukucková M; Renczésová V; Natarajan S; Pálffy R; Gardlík R; Hodosy J; Behuliak M; Vlková B; Minárik G; Szemes T; Stuchlík S; Turna J
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2005 Dec; 59(10):531-40. PubMed ID: 16298508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biodiversity and agro-ecology in field margins.
    De Cauwer B; Reheul D; Nijs I; Milbau A
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(1):17-49. PubMed ID: 16363358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
    Smyth S; McHughen A
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of herbicide regimes and the associated potential environmental effects of glyphosate-resistant crops versus what they replace in Europe.
    Kleter GA; Harris C; Stephenson G; Unsworth J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2008 Apr; 64(4):479-88. PubMed ID: 18078305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion.
    Blumenthal DM
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Jul; 9(7):887-95. PubMed ID: 16796578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices.
    Hails RS
    Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):685-8. PubMed ID: 12167875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Explaining public resistance to genetically modified corn: an analysis of the distribution of benefits and risks.
    Wu F
    Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):715-26. PubMed ID: 15209940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops.
    Romeis J; Raybould A; Bigler F; Candolfi MP; Hellmich RL; Huesing JE; Shelton AM
    Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(3):901-9. PubMed ID: 23062830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
    Gurian-Sherman D
    Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops.
    Raybould A
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(3):123-33. PubMed ID: 21975253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reducing uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for transgenic crops: more ecological research or clearer environmental risk assessment?
    Raybould A
    GM Crops; 2010; 1(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21912209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Debates on Genetically Modified Crops in the Context of Sustainable Development.
    Gerasimova K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Apr; 22(2):525-47. PubMed ID: 26062746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment.
    Conner AJ; Glare TR; Nap JP
    Plant J; 2003 Jan; 33(1):19-46. PubMed ID: 12943539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.