These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20015260)
21. Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy. Burger J; Gochfeld M; Powers CW J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 16554118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Nexus between ecological risk assessment and natural resource damage assessment under CERCLA: introduction to a Society of Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryTechnical Workshop. Stahl RG; Gouguet R; Charters D; Clements W; Gala W; Haddad R; Helm R; Landis W; Maki A; Munns WR; Young D Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):496-9. PubMed ID: 19545185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Novel roles for genetically modified plants in environmental protection. Macek T; Kotrba P; Svatos A; Novakova M; Demnerova K; Mackova M Trends Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18243383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biodiversity and agro-ecology in field margins. De Cauwer B; Reheul D; Nijs I; Milbau A Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(1):17-49. PubMed ID: 16363358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops. Smyth S; McHughen A Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of herbicide regimes and the associated potential environmental effects of glyphosate-resistant crops versus what they replace in Europe. Kleter GA; Harris C; Stephenson G; Unsworth J Pest Manag Sci; 2008 Apr; 64(4):479-88. PubMed ID: 18078305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion. Blumenthal DM Ecol Lett; 2006 Jul; 9(7):887-95. PubMed ID: 16796578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices. Hails RS Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6898):685-8. PubMed ID: 12167875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Explaining public resistance to genetically modified corn: an analysis of the distribution of benefits and risks. Wu F Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):715-26. PubMed ID: 15209940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops. Romeis J; Raybould A; Bigler F; Candolfi MP; Hellmich RL; Huesing JE; Shelton AM Chemosphere; 2013 Jan; 90(3):901-9. PubMed ID: 23062830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The bucket and the searchlight: formulating and testing risk hypotheses about the weediness and invasiveness potential of transgenic crops. Raybould A Environ Biosafety Res; 2010; 9(3):123-33. PubMed ID: 21975253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reducing uncertainty in regulatory decision-making for transgenic crops: more ecological research or clearer environmental risk assessment? Raybould A GM Crops; 2010; 1(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21912209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Debates on Genetically Modified Crops in the Context of Sustainable Development. Gerasimova K Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Apr; 22(2):525-47. PubMed ID: 26062746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. Conner AJ; Glare TR; Nap JP Plant J; 2003 Jan; 33(1):19-46. PubMed ID: 12943539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]