285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20015413)
1. [The scope of prenatal diagnostic testing for chromosomal aberrations: broad or narrow? Ethical considerations on the choice of tests].
de Jong A; Dondorp WJ; de Wert GM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A1060. PubMed ID: 20015413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of prenatal diagnosis: rapid testing or full karyotype? An audit of chromosome abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes for women referred for Down's Syndrome testing.
Ogilvie CM; Lashwood A; Chitty L; Waters JJ; Scriven PN; Flinter F
BJOG; 2005 Oct; 112(10):1369-75. PubMed ID: 16167939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Full karyotyping, rapid aneuploidy diagnosis or both when invasive prenatal testing is performed for diagnosis of thalassaemia?
Tse KY; Leung WC; Leung KY; Lee CP; Ng LK; Lau ET; Chan V; Tang MH
Mol Hum Reprod; 2006 Jan; 12(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 16421217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rapid aneuploidy testing (knowing less) versus traditional karyotyping (knowing more) for advanced maternal age: what would be missed, who should decide?
Leung WC; Lau ET; Lau WL; Tang R; Wong SF; Lau TK; Tse KT; Wong SF; To WK; Ng LK; Lao TT; Tang MH;
Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Feb; 14(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18239237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid aneuploidy detection or karyotyping? Ethical reflection.
de Jong A; Dondorp WJ; Timmermans DR; van Lith JM; de Wert GM
Eur J Hum Genet; 2011 Oct; 19(10):1020-5. PubMed ID: 21629296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Molecular biology usefulness for rapid diagnosis of Down's syndrome and common aneuploidies].
Fauret AL; Bilan F; Patri S; Couet D; Marechaud M; Pierre F; Gilbert-Dussardier B; Kitzis A
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009; 37(7-8):611-9. PubMed ID: 19574080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid aneuploidy testing versus traditional karyotyping: is it better to know more?
Leung TN
Hong Kong Med J; 2008 Feb; 14(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 18239236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1459-67. PubMed ID: 18055749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. QF-PCR-based prenatal detection of common aneuploidies in the Czech population: five years of experience.
Putzova M; Soldatova I; Pecnova L; Dvorakova L; Jencikova N; Goetz P; Stejskal D
Eur J Med Genet; 2008; 51(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 18378202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual testing with QF-PCR and karyotype analysis for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Evaluation of 13,500 cases with consideration of using QF-PCR as a stand-alone test according to referral indications.
Papoulidis I; Siomou E; Sotiriadis A; Efstathiou G; Psara A; Sevastopoulou E; Anastasakis E; Sifakis S; Tsiligianni T; Kontodiou M; Malamaki C; Tzimina M; Petersen MB; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A
Prenat Diagn; 2012 Jul; 32(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 22513450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New trends in prenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities.
Addar MH
Saudi Med J; 2000 May; 21(5):429-32. PubMed ID: 11500675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal diagnosis by rapid aneuploidy detection and karyotyping: a prospective study of the role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocenteses.
Leung WC; Waters JJ; Chitty L
Prenat Diagn; 2004 Oct; 24(10):790-5. PubMed ID: 15503279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 27: Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal abnormalities.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 97(5 Pt 1):suppl 1-12. PubMed ID: 11501567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA): a reliable alternative for fetal chromosome analysis?
Chitty LS; Kistler J; Akolekar R; Liddle S; Nicolaides K; Levett L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1383-6. PubMed ID: 22098527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The value of a novel prenatal diagnosis model with combination of karyotyping and BACs-on-Beads
Mou K; Liu Y; Wei X
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 34(3):332-335. PubMed ID: 28604949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges.
de Jong A; Maya I; van Lith JM
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25521968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Prenatal diagnosis of women with an adverse reproductive history using both traditional karyotyping and SNP-array].
Yu HS; Guo H; Shen SS; Li XC; Zhang LP; Fan XF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 53(3):155-159. PubMed ID: 29609228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimized criteria for using fluorescence in situ hybridization in the prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies.
Leclercq S; Lebbar A; Grange G; Tsatsaris V; Le Tessier D; Dupont JM
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Apr; 28(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 18306148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Prenatal chromosome analysis using the FISH technique allows fetal aneuploidy detection within a few hours].
Steinborn A; Röddiger S; Born HJ; Baier P; Halberstadt E
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1996; 200(5):186-90. PubMed ID: 9035828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of a Chromosomal Microarray for Prenatal Diagnosis Using a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancies with Increased Risk for Chromosome Abnormalities.
Wright D; Carey L; Battersby S; Nguyen T; Clarke M; Nash B; Gulesserian E; Cross J; Darmanian A
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2016 Dec; 20(12):791-798. PubMed ID: 27690282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
