These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20015573)

  • 1. A biogeochemical model of contaminant fate and transport in river waters and sediments.
    Massoudieh A; Bombardelli FA; Ginn TR
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Mar; 112(1-4):103-17. PubMed ID: 20015573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model for contaminant mass flux in capped sediment under consolidation.
    Alshawabkeh AN; Rahbar N; Sheahan T
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Jul; 78(3):147-65. PubMed ID: 16005541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TREX: spatially distributed model to assess watershed contaminant transport and fate.
    Velleux ML; England JF; Julien PY
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Oct; 404(1):113-28. PubMed ID: 18649925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The source and fate of sediment and mercury in the Tapajós River, Pará, Brazilian Amazon: Ground- and space-based evidence.
    Telmer K; Costa M; Simões Angélica R; Araujo ES; Maurice Y
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 81(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 16824670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sediment-adsorbed total mercury flux through Yolo Bypass, the primary floodway and wetland in the Sacramento Valley, California.
    Springborn M; Singer MB; Dunne T
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Dec; 412-413():203-13. PubMed ID: 22078330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dispersion of 137Cs and 239,240Pu in the Rhone River plume: a numerical model.
    Periáñez R
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 77(3):301-24. PubMed ID: 15381323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions of land use and dynamic river conditions on sorption equilibria between benthic sediments and river soluble reactive phosphorus concentrations.
    Stutter MI; Lumsdon DG
    Water Res; 2008 Oct; 42(16):4249-60. PubMed ID: 18775552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sorption and transport of iodine species in sediments from the Savannah River and Hanford Sites.
    Hu Q; Zhao P; Moran JE; Seaman JC
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Jul; 78(3):185-205. PubMed ID: 16019109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrated modelling of conventional pollutants and organic contaminant fate in rivers: a microcosm study.
    Deksissa T; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(12):73-81. PubMed ID: 16477973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Land-sea mercury transport through a modified watershed, SE Brazil.
    Molisani MM; Kjerfve B; Barreto R; de Lacerda LD
    Water Res; 2007 May; 41(9):1929-38. PubMed ID: 17382988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A fugacity based continuous and dynamic fate and transport model for river networks and its application to Altamaha River.
    Kilic SG; Aral MM
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jun; 407(12):3855-66. PubMed ID: 19321188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterisation of bed sediments and suspension of the river Po (Italy) during normal and high flow conditions.
    Davide V; Pardos M; Diserens J; Ugazio G; Thomas R; Dominik J
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2847-64. PubMed ID: 12767288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mercury cycling between the water column and surface sediments in a contaminated area.
    Ramalhosa E; Segade SR; Pereira E; Vale C; Duarte A
    Water Res; 2006 Aug; 40(15):2893-900. PubMed ID: 16854448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulation of resuspended sediments resulting from dredging operations by a numerical flocculent transport model.
    Je CH; Hayes DF; Kim KS
    Chemosphere; 2007 Dec; 70(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 17697700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk assessment of contaminated sediments in river basins--theoretical considerations and pragmatic approach.
    Heise S; Förstner U
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):943-52. PubMed ID: 17726554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wavelet and ANN combination model for prediction of daily suspended sediment load in rivers.
    Rajaee T
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jul; 409(15):2917-28. PubMed ID: 21546062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A retrospective analysis of trace metals, C, N and diatom remnants in sediments from the Mississippi River delta shelf.
    Turner RE; Milan CS; Rabalais NN
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2004 Oct; 49(7-8):548-56. PubMed ID: 15476833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A reaction-based paradigm to model reactive chemical transport in groundwater with general kinetic and equilibrium reactions.
    Zhang F; Yeh GT; Parker JC; Brooks SC; Pace MN; Kim YJ; Jardine PM; Watson DB
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jun; 92(1-2):10-32. PubMed ID: 17229488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An assessment of the fine sediment dynamics in an upland river system: INCA-Sed modifications and implications for fisheries.
    Lazar AN; Butterfield D; Futter MN; Rankinen K; Thouvenot-Korppoo M; Jarritt N; Lawrence DS; Wade AJ; Whitehead PG
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 May; 408(12):2555-66. PubMed ID: 20347117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geochemistry of trace metals in a fresh water sediment: field results and diagenetic modeling.
    Canavan RW; Van Cappellen P; Zwolsman JJ; van den Berg GA; Slomp CP
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Aug; 381(1-3):263-79. PubMed ID: 17482239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.