These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20015774)

  • 1. Benefit from bimodal hearing in a group of prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users.
    Berrettini S; Passetti S; Giannarelli M; Forli F
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2010; 31(5):332-8. PubMed ID: 20015774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sound localization and binaural hearing in children with a hearing aid and a cochlear implant.
    Beijen J; Snik AF; Straatman LV; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 19451708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit.
    Morera C; Cavalle L; Manrique M; Huarte A; Angel R; Osorio A; Garcia-Ibañez L; Estrada E; Morera-Ballester C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1084-94. PubMed ID: 22667256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of frequency compression hearing aids for unilaterally implanted children with acoustically amplified residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear.
    Park LR; Teagle HF; Buss E; Roush PA; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e1-e12. PubMed ID: 22531574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of a contralateral hearing aid to perception of consonant voicing, intonation, and emotional state in adult cochlear implantees.
    Most T; Gaon-Sivan G; Shpak T; Luntz M
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(2):244-58. PubMed ID: 22057984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term speech perception in children with cochlear implants compared with children with conventional hearing aids.
    Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S129-30. PubMed ID: 9391631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory aids in conjunction with cochlear implants.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Am J Otol; 1992 Jul; 13(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 1415491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Straatman LV; Rietveld AC; Beijen J; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1884-95. PubMed ID: 20968360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implantation on prelingually deafened adults.
    Yoshida H; Kanda Y; Miyamoto I; Fukuda T; Takahashi H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2008 Sep; 35(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 18248927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Mok M; Galvin KL; Dowell RC; McKay CM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 19468210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of life in bimodal hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids).
    Farinetti A; Roman S; Mancini J; Baumstarck-Barrau K; Meller R; Lavieille JP; Triglia JM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3209-15. PubMed ID: 25373837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of bimodal hearing in Korean children with profound hearing loss.
    Lee SH; Lee KY; Huh MJ; Jang HS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Nov; 128(11):1227-32. PubMed ID: 19241597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural history of contralateral residual hearing in unilateral cochlear implant users - long-term findings.
    Yehudai N; Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1073-6. PubMed ID: 22691155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.