136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20017111)
1. Contemporary approaches for processing and handling of radical prostactomy specimens.
Sung MT; Cheng L
Histol Histopathol; 2010 Feb; 25(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20017111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. International society of urological pathology consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B
Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Jul; 18(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21654361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis and prognostic factors of the specimen of radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer].
Fromont G; Molinié V; Soulié M; Salomon L
Prog Urol; 2015 Nov; 25(15):999-1009. PubMed ID: 26519964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens].
Compérat E; Camparo P; Srigley J; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
Ann Pathol; 2013 Jun; 33(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 23790653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pathological analysis of lymph nodes in anterior prostatic fat excised at robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Aning JJ; Thurairaja R; Gillatt DA; Koupparis AJ; Rowe EW; Oxley J
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):787-91. PubMed ID: 24996431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radical prostatectomy: processing, staging, and prognosis. Parts I and II.
Epstein JI
Int J Surg Pathol; 2010 Jun; 18(3 Suppl):118S-123S. PubMed ID: 20484275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens and diagnostic reporting of pathological findings.
Montironi R; Lopez-Beltran A; Mazzucchelli R; Scarpelli M; Bollito E
Pathologica; 2001 Jun; 93(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 11433618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.
Epstein JI; Amin M; Boccon-Gibod L; Egevad L; Humphrey PA; Mikuz G; Newling D; Nilsson S; Sakr W; Srigley JR; Wheeler TM; Montironi R
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 2005 May; (216):34-63. PubMed ID: 16019758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percentage of positive biopsies predicts lymph node involvement in men with low-risk prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Heidenreich A; Pfister D; Thüer D; Brehmer B
BJU Int; 2011 Jan; 107(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 20590538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting the risk of lymph node invasion during radical prostatectomy using the European Association of Urology guideline nomogram: a validation study.
Schmitges J; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M; Abdollah F; Budäus L; Isbarn H; Bianchi M; Trinh QD; Schlomm T; Chun FK; Graefen M; Steuber T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 38(7):624-9. PubMed ID: 22531769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re: the predictors of pelvic lymph node metastasis at radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Liedberg F
J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 1):1545-6. PubMed ID: 15371890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.
Steuber T; Budäus L; Walz J; Zorn KC; Schlomm T; Chun F; Ahyai S; Fisch M; Sauter G; Huland H; Graefen M; Haese A
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1755-61. PubMed ID: 20942833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling.
Samaratunga H; Montironi R; True L; Epstein JI; Griffiths DF; Humphrey PA; van der Kwast T; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Egevad L;
Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 20834234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.
Suardi N; Larcher A; Haese A; Ficarra V; Govorov A; Buffi NM; Walz J; Rocco B; Borghesi M; Steuber T; Pini G; Briganti A; Mottrie AM; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Pushkar D; Van Der Poel H;
Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 24411992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance characteristics of computed tomography in detecting lymph node metastases in contemporary patients with prostate cancer treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Briganti A; Abdollah F; Nini A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni NM; Salonia A; Colombo R; Freschi M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2012 Jun; 61(6):1132-8. PubMed ID: 22099610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens. A protocol with clinical relevance.
Montironi R; Mazzucchelli R; Kwast T
Virchows Arch; 2003 Mar; 442(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 12647209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative frozen section assessment of pelvic lymph nodes during radical prostatectomy is of limited value.
Song J; Li M; Zagaja GP; Taxy JB; Shalhav AL; Al-Ahmadie HA
BJU Int; 2010 Nov; 106(10):1463-7. PubMed ID: 20477824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate. Practice parameters, pathologic staging, and handling radical prostatectomy specimens.
Sakr WA; Grignon DJ
Urol Clin North Am; 1999 Aug; 26(3):453-63, v. PubMed ID: 10494284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens.
Srigley JR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):303-17. PubMed ID: 16519557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
