These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20017682)

  • 21. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The design and testing of a noise reduction algorithm based on spectral subtraction.
    Elberling C; Ludvigsen C; Keidser G
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():39-49. PubMed ID: 8153563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The objective and subjective evaluation of low-frequency expansion in wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments.
    Lowery KJ; Plyler PN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Sep; 18(8):641-52. PubMed ID: 18326151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period.
    Munro KJ; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Feb; 44(2):92-101. PubMed ID: 15913157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Users' perspectives on the benefits of FM systems with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Fournier P; Séguin C; Armstrong S; Chénier J; Schramm D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20053156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of two bone anchored hearing instruments: BP100 and Ponto Pro.
    Olsen SØ; Glad H; Nielsen LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 50(12):920-8. PubMed ID: 21916792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children: Preference in real world use.
    Scollie S; Ching TY; Seewald R; Dillon H; Britton L; Steinberg J; Corcoran J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S49-63. PubMed ID: 20109089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adults who report difficulty hearing speech in noise: an exploration of experiences, impacts and coping strategies.
    Pang J; Beach EF; Gilliver M; Yeend I
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):851-860. PubMed ID: 31560221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of feedback-reduction algorithms for hearing aids.
    Greenberg JE; Zurek PM; Brantley M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2366-76. PubMed ID: 11108377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examination of the CROS type hearing aid.
    Lotterman SH; Kasten RN
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):416-20. PubMed ID: 5558098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perception of urban park soundscape.
    Tse MS; Chau CK; Choy YS; Tsui WK; Chan CN; Tang SK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2762-71. PubMed ID: 22501055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Individual consistency of hearing for speech across diverse listening conditions.
    Carhart R; Tillman TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Mar; 15(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 5012794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audiology and the America's Cup: communication challenges in an extreme environment.
    Keith W; Lyes R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Oct; 12(9):490. PubMed ID: 11699820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Hearing training with network-attached electroacoustic changer for severe hearing disorders].
    Parow E
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1968; 191(2):606-14. PubMed ID: 5716749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of a non-talking rule on the sound level and perception of patients in an outpatient infusion center.
    Zijlstra E; Hagedoorn M; Krijnen WP; van der Schans CP; Mobach MP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212804. PubMed ID: 30817782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A qualitative study of strategies for managing a hearing impairment.
    Hallberg LR; Carlsson SG
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Jun; 25(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 1873586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Satisfaction With Noise Reduction Circuits.
    Bentler RA
    Am J Audiol; 1993 Mar; 2(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 26660933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.