These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20017683)

  • 1. A high rate n-of-m speech processing strategy for the first generation Clarion cochlear implant.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Buechner C; Boyle P; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Dec; 48(12):868-75. PubMed ID: 20017683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
    Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
    Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear Nucleus CI24RE device: relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles.
    Battmer RD; Dillier N; Lai WK; Begall K; Leypon EE; González JC; Manrique M; Morera C; Müller-Deile J; Wesarg T; Zarowski A; Killian MJ; von Wallenberg E; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):657-66. PubMed ID: 20583945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: stimulation rates up to 5000 pps.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Büchner C; Gaertner L; Stoever T; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010; 130(1):114-23. PubMed ID: 19479460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of pulse width, pulse rate and paired electrode stimulation on psychophysical measures of dynamic range and speech recognition in cochlear implants.
    Bonnet RM; Boermans PP; Avenarius OF; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 22517184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of Veterans Affairs cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Roland JT; Bromberg B; Cambron N; Gibbs L; Parkinson W; Snead C
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):462-5. PubMed ID: 9233486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results with a cochlear implant channel-picking strategy based on "Selected Groups".
    Kals M; Schatzer R; Krenmayr A; Vermeire K; Visser D; Bader P; Neustetter C; Zangerl M; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):63-9. PubMed ID: 19944138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Across-frequency delays based on the cochlear traveling wave: enhanced speech presentation for cochlear implants.
    Taft DA; Grayden DB; Burkitt AN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Mar; 57(3):596-606. PubMed ID: 19846368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.
    Lan N; Nie KB; Gao SK; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May; 51(5):752-60. PubMed ID: 15132501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent developments with the nucleus 22-electrode cochlear implant: a new two formant speech coding strategy and its performance in background noise.
    Franz BK; Dowell RC; Clark GM; Seligman PM; Patrick JF
    Am J Otol; 1987 Nov; 8(6):516-8. PubMed ID: 3434615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
    Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of continuous interleaved sampling and simultaneous analog stimulation speech processing strategies in newly implanted adults with a Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Smith S; Waltzman S; Chute P; Domico E; Firszt J; Hodges A; Mills D; Whearty M; Osberger MJ; Fisher L
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 May; 26(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 15891649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.