These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2001896)

  • 41. A confirmatory factor analytic investigation of the TAS-20: corroboration of a five-factor model and suggestions for improvement.
    Gignac GE; Palmer BR; Stough C
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Dec; 89(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 18001225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hypnotic susceptibility and the endogenous eyeblink: a brief communication.
    Lindsay S; Kurtz RM; Stern JA
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Apr; 41(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 8468106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Imagination Inventory and its correlates with imagery and hypnotizability.
    Siuta J
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Oct; 39(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 8936712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The relationship between transliminality, hypnotic and imaginative suggestibility, and other personality traits.
    Irving AJ; Nikolova N; Robinson S; Ionita I; Kelly SW; Kirsch I; Mazzoni G; Venneri A; McGeown WJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Mar; 243():104125. PubMed ID: 38245938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.
    De Pascalis V; Bellusci A; Russo PM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2000 Jul; 48(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 10902296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C: normative data of a Dutch student sample.
    Näring GW; Roelofs K; Hoogduin KA
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2001 Apr; 49(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 11294117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Predicting three mood phenomena from factors and facets of the NEO-PI.
    Velting DM; Liebert RM
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Feb; 68(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 9018848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Validation of a Greek adaptation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale.
    Tsaousis I; Taylor G; Quilty L; Georgiades S; Stavrogiannopoulos M; Bagby RM
    Compr Psychiatry; 2010; 51(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 20579520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessment of hypnotic processes and responsiveness in a clinical context.
    Spinhoven P; Vanderlinden J; ter Kuile MM; Linseen AC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):210-24. PubMed ID: 8335420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Have the hypnotic susceptibility scales outlived their usefulness?
    Woody EZ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):226-38. PubMed ID: 9204636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Hypnotic susceptibility: a personal and historical note regarding the development and naming of the Stanford Scales.
    Weitzenhoffer AM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Apr; 45(2):126-43. PubMed ID: 9077050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Suggestibility or hypnosis: what do our scales really measure?
    Kirsch I
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 9204635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Dyadic Adjustment Scale: clinical interest of a revision and validation of an abbreviated form].
    Antoine P; Christophe V; Nandrino JL
    Encephale; 2008 Jan; 34(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18514149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The relationship between fantasy proneness and schizotypy in adolescents.
    Sánchez-Bernardos ML; Avia MD
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Jun; 194(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 16772857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The 5-Dimensional Personality Test (5DPT): relationships with two lexically based instruments and the validation of the absorption scale.
    van Kampen D
    J Pers Assess; 2012; 94(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 22176270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Direct and indirect scales of hypnotic susceptibility: resistance to therapy and psychometric comparability.
    Robin BR; Kumar VK; Pekala RJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Apr; 53(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 16025732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Imagery and hypnotizability revisited.
    Kogon MM; Jasiukaitis P; Berardi A; Gupta M; Kosslyn SM; Spiegel D
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 9780527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The use of a multimodal image, the apple technique, to facilitate clinical hypnosis: a brief communication.
    Strauss BS
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1991 Jan; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2001894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: relationships with cultural and economic conservative beliefs.
    Van Hiel A; Mervielde I
    J Pers; 2004 Aug; 72(4):659-86. PubMed ID: 15210013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Experiential scoring for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C scale.
    Kirsch I; Milling LS; Burgess C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Jul; 46(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 9650439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.