BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20018994)

  • 21. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Stejskal W; Colwell LH; Morris J; Chauhan P; Dietz P
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of a television crime-drama series to promote legal understanding in mentally ill, incompetent defendants: a pilot study.
    Montgomery J; Brooks MH
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Mar; 50(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 15813561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Competence-related abilities and psychiatric symptoms: an analysis of the underlying structure and correlates of the MacCAT-CA and the BPRS.
    Jacobs MS; Ryba NL; Zapf PA
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Feb; 32(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 17546483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: an analysis of 894 pretrial referrals.
    Warren JI; Fitch WL; Dietz PE; Rosenfeld BD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 2039849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mentally ill and non-mentally ill defendants' abilities to understand information relevant to adjudication: a preliminary study.
    Hoge SK; Poythress N; Bonnie R; Eisenberg M; Monahan J; Feucht-Haviar T; Oberlander L
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 8807159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adjudicative competence: evidence that impairment in "rational understanding" is taxonic.
    Marcus DK; Poythress NG; Edens JF; Lilienfeld SO
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 20822285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An analogue study of the factors influencing competency decisions.
    Blashfield RK; Robbins L; Barnard GW
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(4):587-94. PubMed ID: 7718931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The performance of incarcerated juveniles on the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA).
    Ficke SL; Hart KJ; Deardorff PA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(3):360-73. PubMed ID: 17032960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correlates of adjudicative competence among psychiatrically impaired juveniles.
    Warren JI; Aaron J; Ryan E; Chauhan P; DuVal J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 14584528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Competency to stand trial in preadjudicated and petitioned juvenile defendants.
    Baerger DR; Griffin EF; Lyons JS; Simmons R
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 14584530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Convergent validity of a screening measure designed to identify defendants feigning knowledge deficits related to competence to stand trial.
    Otto RK; Musick JE; Sherrod C
    Assessment; 2011 Mar; 18(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 20634419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Restoration of competency to stand trial: a training program for persons with mental retardation.
    Wall BW; Krupp BH; Guilmette T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 12875497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Psychiatric aspects of criminal responsibility: insanity and mitigation.
    Burrows M; Reid WH
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2011 Nov; 17(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 22108401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The detection of feigned mental disorders on specific competency measures.
    Rogers R; Sewell KW; Grandjean NR; Vitacco MJ
    Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 12056080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Commentary: UK perspective on competency to stand trial.
    Exworthy T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 17185475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Schizophrenia and jurisdictional identifications of mental diseases].
    Wang YH; Qiao K; Zhu GY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 23(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 17330763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
    Konrad N; Völlm B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A study of criminal defendants referred for multiple psychiatric examinations regarding their competency to stand trial.
    Bluestone H; Melella J; Baskin D
    J Forensic Sci; 1981 Apr; 26(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 7264586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A study of criminal defendants referred for competency to stand trial in New York City.
    Bluestone H; Melella J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 540167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.