These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20020077)
1. The effect of the surface roughness of porcelain on the adhesion of oral Streptococcus mutans. Al-Marzok MI; Al-Azzawi HJ J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E017-24. PubMed ID: 20020077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Adhesion of oral microorganisms on dental porcelain polished and glazed]. Wang YN; Wen GJ; Shi B; Pan XH Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Sep; 38(5):342-4. PubMed ID: 14680580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. Kawai K; Urano M; Ebisu S J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 10842136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain. Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans NCTC 10449 to artificial teeth: an in vitro study. Hahnel S; Rosentritt M; Bürgers R; Handel G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 18922260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study on the microbial adhesion to preveneered and stainless steel crowns. Bin AlShaibah WM; El-Shehaby FA; El-Dokky NA; Reda AR J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 23263423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials. Checketts MR; Turkyilmaz I; Asar NV J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1265-70. PubMed ID: 24831748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of saliva substitute films on initial Streptococcus mutans adhesion to enamel and dental substrata. Hahnel S; Rosentritt M; Handel G; Bürgers R J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):977-83. PubMed ID: 18789569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites. Kantorski KZ; Scotti R; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Koga-Ito CY; Jorge AO Gen Dent; 2008; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro staining effects of stannous fluoride and sodium fluoride on ceramic material. Artopoulou II; Powers JM; Chambers MS J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 20188238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. Eick S; Glockmann E; Brandl B; Pfister W J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15025662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. Attar N J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphology and bacterial colonisation of tooth/ceramic restoration interface after different cement excess removal techniques. Anami LC; Pereira CA; Guerra E; Assunção e Souza RO; Jorge AO; Bottino MA J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):742-9. PubMed ID: 22617433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel. Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces. Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of porcelain surface and flexural strength obtained by microwave and conventional oven glazing. Prasad S; Monaco EA; Kim H; Davis EL; Brewer JD J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jan; 101(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19105988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials. Kawai K; Urano M Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 11504440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of 30-day-old Streptococcus mutans biofilm on the surface of esthetic restorative materials--an in vitro study. Fúcio SB; Carvalho FG; Sobrinho LC; Sinhoreti MA; Puppin-Rontani RM J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 18621456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic. Jung M Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11931137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]