196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20020295)
1. Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) may have low clinical utility in gastric cancer patients treated by limited lymphadenectomy: results from a single-center experience of 526 patients.
Pedrazzani C; Sivins A; Ancans G; Marrelli D; Corso G; Krumins V; Roviello F; Leja M
World J Surg; 2010 Jan; 34(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20020295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?
Biondi A; D'Ugo D; Cananzi FC; Papa V; Borasi A; Sicoli F; Degiuli M; Doglietto G; Persiani R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):779-86. PubMed ID: 25899981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New metastatic lymph node ratio system reduces stage migration in patients undergoing D1 lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Maduekwe UN; Lauwers GY; Fernandez-Del-Castillo C; Berger DL; Ferguson CM; Rattner DW; Yoon SS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 May; 17(5):1267-77. PubMed ID: 20099040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.
Lauricella S; Caricato M; Mascianà G; Carannante F; Carnazza M; Bonaccorso A; Angeletti S; Ciccozzi M; Coppola R; Capolupo GT
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():223-233. PubMed ID: 32869748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.
Sun Z; Xu Y; Li de M; Wang ZN; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu HM
Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20336791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification.
Ichikura T; Tomimatsu S; Uefuji K; Kimura M; Uchida T; Morita D; Mochizuki H
Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 10440681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer.
Nelen SD; van Steenbergen LN; Dassen AE; van der Wurff AA; Lemmens VE; Bosscha K
Acta Oncol; 2013 Nov; 52(8):1751-9. PubMed ID: 23317142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.
Liu H; Deng J; Zhang R; Hao X; Jiao X; Liang H
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 23541652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re-evaluating the prognostic validity of the negative to positive lymph node ratio in node-positive gastric cancer patients.
Yamashita H; Deng J; Liang H; Seto Y
Surgery; 2017 Jun; 161(6):1588-1596. PubMed ID: 28111043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy.
Jian-Hui C; Shi-Rong C; Hui W; Si-le C; Jian-Bo X; Er-Tao Z; Chuang-Qi C; Yu-Long H
Tumour Biol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):11105-13. PubMed ID: 26912060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria.
Gong Y; Pan S; Wang X; Zhu G; Xu H; Zhu Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e27-e32. PubMed ID: 32631708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer. A critical review.
Nitti D; Marchet A; Olivieri M; Ambrosi A; Mencarelli R; Farinati F; Belluco C; Lise M
Suppl Tumori; 2003; 2(5):S35-8. PubMed ID: 12914388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prognostic value of N-ratio in patients with gastric cancer: validation in a large, multicenter series.
Marchet A; Mocellin S; Ambrosi A; de Manzoni G; Di Leo A; Marrelli D; Roviello F; Morgagni P; Saragoni L; Natalini G; De Santis F; Baiocchi L; Coniglio A; Nitti D;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 17566691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma.
Celen O; Yildirim E; Berberoglu U
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 96(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 17443727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients following D1 resection. Comparison with the current TNM staging system.
Bouliaris K; Rachiotis G; Diamantis A; Christodoulidis G; Polychronopoulou E; Tepetes K
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1350-1356. PubMed ID: 28433495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio: the lymph node ratio could be a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer.
Hou Y; Wang X; Chen J
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 16(1):198. PubMed ID: 30286762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can extracapsular lymph node involvement be a tool to fine-tune pN1 for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction in the Union Internationale contre le Cancer (UICC) TNM 7th edition?†.
Nafteux P; Lerut T; De Hertogh G; Moons J; Coosemans W; Decker G; Van Veer H; De Leyn P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Jun; 45(6):1001-10. PubMed ID: 24477743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of the prognostic value of UICC and JGCA lymph node staging criteria for gastric cancer].
Pan Y; Liang H; Xue Q; Zhang RP; Cui QH; Liu N; Wang BG
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 May; 30(5):376-80. PubMed ID: 18953840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
