These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20020913)
1. In silico tools for sharing data and knowledge on toxicity and metabolism: derek for windows, meteor, and vitic. Marchant CA; Briggs KA; Long A Toxicol Mech Methods; 2008; 18(2-3):177-87. PubMed ID: 20020913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Knowledge-based expert systems for toxicity and metabolism prediction: DEREK, StAR and METEOR. Greene N; Judson PN; Langowski JJ; Marchant CA SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999; 10(2-3):299-314. PubMed ID: 10491855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structure-activity relationships for skin sensitization: recent improvements to Derek for Windows. Langton K; Patlewicz GY; Long A; Marchant CA; Basketter DA Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):342-7. PubMed ID: 17101009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Lhasa Limited Products for the In Silico Prediction of Drug Toxicity. Ponting DJ; Burns MJ; Foster RS; Hemingway R; Kocks G; MacMillan DS; Shannon-Little AL; Tennant RE; Tidmarsh JR; Yeo DJ Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2425():435-478. PubMed ID: 35188642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and validation of expert (Q)SAR systems. Hulzebos E; Sijm D; Traas T; Posthumus R; Maslankiewicz L SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):385-401. PubMed ID: 16234178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined Use of MC4PC, MDL-QSAR, BioEpisteme, Leadscope PDM, and Derek for Windows Software to Achieve High-Performance, High-Confidence, Mode of Action-Based Predictions of Chemical Carcinogenesis in Rodents. Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD; Contrera JF; Marchant CA; Yang C Toxicol Mech Methods; 2008; 18(2-3):189-206. PubMed ID: 20020914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of in silico systems for ames test mutagenicity prediction: scope and limitations. Hillebrecht A; Muster W; Brigo A; Kansy M; Weiser T; Singer T Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 24(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 21534561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using argumentation for absolute reasoning about the potential toxicity of chemicals. Judson PN; Marchant CA; Vessey JD J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(5):1364-70. PubMed ID: 14502468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of in silico genotoxicity tools in the regulatory assessment of pharmaceutical impurities. Fioravanzo E; Bassan A; Pavan M; Mostrag-Szlichtyng A; Worth AP SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2012; 23(3-4):257-77. PubMed ID: 22369620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvements to in silico skin sensitisation predictions through privacy-preserving data sharing. Macmillan DS; Chilton ML; Hillegass J Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Jan; 137():105292. PubMed ID: 36400282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences. Valerio LG Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 241(3):356-70. PubMed ID: 19716836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MetaPath: an electronic knowledge base for collating, exchanging and analyzing case studies of xenobiotic metabolism. Kolanczyk RC; Schmieder P; Jones WJ; Mekenyan OG; Chapkanov A; Temelkov S; Kotov S; Velikova M; Kamenska V; Vasilev K; Veith GD Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jun; 63(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 22414578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Building organizational supports for knowledge sharing in county human service organizations: a cross-case analysis of works-in-progress. Lee C; Austin MJ J Evid Based Soc Work; 2012; 9(1-2):3-18. PubMed ID: 22409608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In silico methods for predicting metabolism and mass fragmentation applied to quetiapine in liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry urine drug screening. Pelander A; Tyrkkö E; Ojanperä I Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2009 Feb; 23(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 19142846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Perspective of predictive toxicity assessment of in vivo repeated dose toxicity using structural activity relationship]. Ono A Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 2010; (128):44-9. PubMed ID: 21381395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status. Box RJ; Spielmann H Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting drug metabolism--an evaluation of the expert system METEOR. Testa B; Balmat AL; Long A; Judson P Chem Biodivers; 2005 Jul; 2(7):872-85. PubMed ID: 17193178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Omics data management and annotation. Harel A; Dalah I; Pietrokovski S; Safran M; Lancet D Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 719():71-96. PubMed ID: 21370079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SyGMa: combining expert knowledge and empirical scoring in the prediction of metabolites. Ridder L; Wagener M ChemMedChem; 2008 May; 3(5):821-32. PubMed ID: 18311745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]