154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2002144)
1. Evaluating measurement models in clinical research: covariance structure analysis of latent variable models of self-conception.
Hoyle RH
J Consult Clin Psychol; 1991 Feb; 59(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 2002144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models.
Epskamp S; Rhemtulla M; Borsboom D
Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):904-927. PubMed ID: 28290111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using SAS PROC CALIS to fit Level-1 error covariance structures of latent growth models.
Ding CG; Jane TD
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):765-87. PubMed ID: 22351601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factor structure of the primary scales of the Inventory of Personality Organization in a nonclinical sample using exploratory structural equation modeling.
Ellison WD; Levy KN
Psychol Assess; 2012 Jun; 24(2):503-17. PubMed ID: 22103552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Approximated adjusted fractional Bayes factors: A general method for testing informative hypotheses.
Gu X; Mulder J; Hoijtink H
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):229-261. PubMed ID: 28857129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing multiple statistical software for multiple-indicator, multiple-cause modeling: an application of gender disparity in adult cognitive functioning using MIDUS II dataset.
Chang C; Gardiner J; Houang R; Yu YL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):275. PubMed ID: 33183226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing groups on latent variables: a structural equation modeling approach.
Dimitrov DM
Work; 2006; 26(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 16788262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Latent Growth Curve and Repeated Measures ANOVA Contrasts: What the Models are Telling You.
Rovine MJ; McDermott PA
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 29220588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models.
Rhemtulla M; van Bork R; Borsboom D
Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 31169371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Latent variable GIMME using model implied instrumental variables (MIIVs).
Gates KM; Fisher ZF; Bollen KA
Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):227-242. PubMed ID: 31246041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures.
Liu Y; Millsap RE; West SG; Tein JY; Tanaka R; Grimm KJ
Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):486-506. PubMed ID: 27213981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous parceling strategies when latent variables represent multidimensional constructs.
Cole DA; Perkins CE; Zelkowitz RL
Psychol Methods; 2016 Jun; 21(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 26323000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: a bifactor answer to a two-factor question?
McKay MT; Boduszek D; Harvey SA
J Pers Assess; 2014; 96(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 24940657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis.
Cole DA; Ciesla JA; Steiger JH
Psychol Methods; 2007 Dec; 12(4):381-398. PubMed ID: 18179350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data.
McArdle JJ
Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():577-605. PubMed ID: 18817479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. General linear contrasts on latent variable means: structural equation hypothesis tests for multivariate clinical trials.
Donaldson GW
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2893-917. PubMed ID: 12953287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the use of structural equation modeling in health communication research.
Stephenson MT; Holbert RL; Zimmerman RS
Health Commun; 2006; 20(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 16965253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construct validity in health behavior research: interpreting latent variable models involving self-report and objective measures.
Palmer RF; Graham JW; Taylor B; Tatterson J
J Behav Med; 2002 Dec; 25(6):525-50. PubMed ID: 12462957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity.
Snyder M; Gangestad S
J Pers Soc Psychol; 1986 Jul; 51(1):125-139. PubMed ID: 3735063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extending Structural Analyses of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale to Consider Criterion-Related Validity: Can Composite Self-Esteem Scores Be Good Enough?
Donnellan MB; Ackerman RA; Brecheen C
J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 26192536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
