BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2002170)

  • 1. A parametric study of cochlear input impedance.
    Puria S; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):287-309. PubMed ID: 2002170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of perilymph viscosity on low-frequency intracochlear pressures and the cochlear input impedance of the cat.
    Koshigoe S; Kwok WK; Tubis A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Aug; 74(2):486-92. PubMed ID: 6619426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intracochlear pressure measurements related to cochlear tuning.
    Olson ES
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):349-67. PubMed ID: 11508960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Middle-ear response in the chinchilla and its relationship to mechanics at the base of the cochlea.
    Ruggero MA; Rich NC; Robles L; Shivapuja BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1612-29. PubMed ID: 2341666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volume flow rate of perilymph in the guinea-pig cochlea.
    Ohyama K; Salt AN; Thalmann R
    Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 35(2-3):119-29. PubMed ID: 3198505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of opening and draining the cochlea.
    Steele CR; Zais JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 1):84-9. PubMed ID: 4019911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Input impedance of the cochlea in cat.
    Lynch TJ; Nedzelnitsky V; Peake WT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jul; 72(1):108-30. PubMed ID: 7108034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear drainage and basilar membrane tuning.
    Patuzzi R; Sellick PM; Johnstone BM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):1064-5. PubMed ID: 7130527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of current stimulus on in vivo cochlear mechanics.
    Parthasarathi AA; Grosh K; Zheng J; Nuttall AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):442-52. PubMed ID: 12558281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A symmetry suppresses the cochlear catastrophe.
    Shera CA; Zweig G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1276-89. PubMed ID: 2030215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear mechanisms at low frequencies in the guinea pig.
    Franke R; Dancer A
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1982; 234(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 7092710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea.
    Nedzelnitsky V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1676-89. PubMed ID: 7462467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What type of force does the cochlear amplifier produce?
    Kolston PJ; de Boer E; Viergever MA; Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1794-801. PubMed ID: 2262635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intracochlear sound pressure measurements in guinea pigs.
    Dancer A; Franke R
    Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):191-205. PubMed ID: 7410227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear mechanics: analysis for a pure tone.
    Holmes MH; Cole JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Sep; 76(3):767-78. PubMed ID: 6491049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure-induced basilar membrane position shifts and the stimulus-evoked potentials in the low-frequency region of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Fridberger A; van Maarseveen JT; Scarfone E; Ulfendahl M; Flock B; Flock A
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1997 Oct; 161(2):239-52. PubMed ID: 9366967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear transducer operating point adaptation.
    Zou Y; Zheng J; Ren T; Nuttall A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2232-41. PubMed ID: 16642838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modifications of cochlear microphonic frequency responses following transient changes of hydrostatic pressure in the perilymph.
    Legouix JP; Avan P; Lenoir M
    Hear Res; 1986; 23(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 3745014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observations on simultaneous perilymphatic motions and cochlear microphonics suppression.
    Haberland E; Neumann HJ
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(5):268-74. PubMed ID: 10529648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.